yeah, noticed that in an earlier response as I was reading down the thread. Did not know that. Makes sense now that I do.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Larry Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > >the term "theory" has a very specific meaning in science. I am not sure > >which theory would need more testing. AFAIK it would not be considered a > >theory if it did. > > > >If you're saying that there is a lot out there that we don't understand, > >then fine. True. But I think your logic is a little fuzzy too. And no, I > >don't quite see the connection between evolution and diabetes... maybe > there > >is one, but insulin seems more like an example of moden medicine. Which > does > >use tools it doesn't quite understand, all the time. > > > > > > Insulin from bacteria with recombinant DNA was developed using evolutionary > methods and with genetic engineering.. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342927 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
