Missing a line it should read The 5 independents have the balance of
power. Reason is restored in the House.

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
> Didn't I say that?
>
> My predictions will be simpler,
>
> Obama will win (although it will be close). Joe Biden stays as VP.
> The Democratic Party retains the senate, and gains 3 seats. Because of
> the new session Harry Reid changes the rules to let simple majorities
> override
> filibusters. Republican Party vows revenge and gets even weirder than before.
> The House is split between the Democratic and Republican parties. The
> 5 independents
>
> Rick Santorum gets a job as a commentator on Fox News.
>
> Romney is a desperation move uses the black arts to resurrect Ronald
> Reagan and names him the VP candidate. The move flops as the
> republican base think Zombie Reagan is too moderate. After the most
> bruising presidential election in memory, Mitt Romney goes back to
> private industry, and opens a chain of rejuvenation salons.
>
> Newt Gingrich is sent to the moon.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I know. Still. It's hard to cast the current administration as the victim
>> when by definition they have more political power than most of the other
>> players. I realize that this leaves out the power of money to make things
>> happen or not happen, but the bully pulpit is kind of important too.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Larry C. Lyons 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Well consider how often such reasonable controls are squelched, such
>>> as restriction on purchasing more than one firearm a month. And look
>>> who does the squelching.
>>>
>>> There are reasonable solutions, but either the political will is not
>>> there, or these solutions are blocked by vested interests.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > pretty much. In an analogous situation, the economy is still a problem
>>> even
>>> > if it's an inherited problem, and it matters that Obama took some of the
>>> > steps he did. He got handed a tough problem, sure, but he didn't resolve
>>> it
>>> > very well. By comparison, how hard is it to stop selling guns to Mexican
>>> > drug lords?
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> It was a bad idea when it was started as well. I don't think Holder
>>> >> deserves blame for starting in since he didn't start it. He does
>>> >> deserve blame for continuing it though. A bad idea is still a bad idea
>>> >> regardless of who started it.
>>> >>
>>> >> Judah
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]
>>> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The irritating thing is that Fast and Furious was a part of Project
>>> >> > Gunrunner. The ATF began Project Gunrunner as a pilot project in
>>> >> > Laredo, Texas, in 2005 and expanded it as a national initiative in
>>> >> > 2006. So Holder, who btw did a great job as the DC AG, has to take the
>>> >> > blame for a Bush initiated project. Yes you don't hear a peep from the
>>> >> > reich wing about that part of it. I guess its only a bad thing if a
>>> >> > Democratic Party  member is in power
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:348458
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to