And that will never happen. It requires a super majority that will simply never be found. On Jan 10, 2013 10:41 AM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You are right, we have no legal recourse to do this. > > I would have the 2nd amendment either modified or repealed with the consent > of the people, before doing anything like what I propose. > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:38 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I would sooner see you dead in the street. I don't dislike you, and > > actually have a good deal of resect for you and sympaty for your beliefs, > > but I would sooner kill you, and there are more then enough people that > > agree with me that if enacted these kinds of laws will make this country > > collapse into the flame and blood of civil war. > > > > You do not have the right to do these things. Period, the end dead stop. > > I'm not threatening you or anyone else, only reminding you that as > > Americans we have another recourse outside the legal framework, and that > > 3-10% of us are more than willing to do whatever is necessary to defend > our > > inalienable natural god given rights. Are you willing to kill and die > for > > this? > > > > I am. > > On Jan 10, 2013 10:05 AM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > Outlaw the import, sale, manufacture and possession of hand guns. > > > > > > In the near term, only criminals will have hand guns...the rest of us > > will > > > have shot guns or rifles or whatever brand of assault rifle we see fit. > > As > > > the years go by, the number of hand guns will decrease to the point > where > > > they are relatively rare. > > > > > > I don't pretend that there is any solution that represents a panacea. I > > > just know that hand guns are unnecessary, serve no purpose other than > to > > > aid criminals, we'd be better off without them, the status quo is > > > unacceptable, and any short term pain required to make things better in > > the > > > long run...is worth it, in my opinion. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > So, dispute it. > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Larry C. Lyons < > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > can you parrot any other NRA talking point, I mean try for a > trifecta > > > > > here. Really Sam, ever try for anything original? That argument is > so > > > > > cliched and old that its collecting social security. If that's the > > > > > best you can do why are you here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359859 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
