No matter how you slice it, he was suspended because he got involved. If you want to add a technicality to help you sleep at night so be it. There is no excuse to suspend anyone for not going public.
. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just realized what they did to cover their asses....they added a '?' at > the end of the headline. > > It is not making a statement, rather, asking a question. The implication, > from the headline, is that he was suspended because he disarmed a student, > even though the first paragraph of the article states otherwise, but, by > then, most readers are already convinced he was suspended for disarming > a fellow student because the headline has steered them towards > that conclusion. > > Very tricky. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:361758 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
