With people like Clarence Thomas on the bench (look up whom his wife lobbies for, its scary) I rather doubt it. Just listening to the audio arguments from C-Span it was pathetic. Scalia just repeated some very tired questions that where shown to be crap years ago. (the Regernus study for instance).
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Marriage is a legal contract. That is the issue before the court. >> The religious aspects are not relevant. > > > They are not *supposed* to be relevant. > > They are VERY relevant to many (most?) opponents. They are not supposed to > be relevant to the Supreme Court, but I am not sure this is perfectly true. > > -Cameron > > ... > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362264 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
