On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Eric Roberts < [email protected]> wrote:
> It doesn't matter if it is relevant to you and me...what matters is > whether or not it is legally relevant. In a general sense, when conversing with someone else, what matters is what is relevant to the people involved in the conversation. When it comes to the Supreme Court, it *should* only be about the legal, non-religious definition. In case you missed it - I AM AGREEING WITH YOU. Like it or not though, there are a whole heaping bunch of people in this country who put quite a bit if religious relevance in the term "marriage". So, in a wider sense, as a national debate (which this currently is), then both the religious and legal meanings of the word "marriage" are part of the discussion - even if they shouldn't be. To me, personally, the religious part of that conversation doesn't matter a whole lot, but I cannot deny that it's relevant to America in a wider sense (even if it shouldn't be). -Cameron ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362273 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
