true, you should never base your hypothesis on a god, since once you've done that, the only proof you'll need is "God did it". But to rule out the possibility of a god or god-like being would be a mistake too.
I think you also need to decouple the term god from the "Mystical white robed man in the sky" kind of definition. That's not the kind of god I'm referring too. All that said, I still haven't found any evidence that's convincing enough for me to believe in a god. On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:50 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Marlon Moyer <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> I won't deny the possibility of a god. That would be bad science start >> with a conclusion. > > > Not to nit pick but, having God ANYWHERE in your hypothesis, would make for > bad science. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:362482 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
