Now it's just a matter of inconvenience? .
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sandra Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > Part of the issue is that Federal and State laws reference the word > "Marriage" or "Married" in the more than 1,600 statues that confer benefits > and responsibilities to couples who are allowed to legally marry. > > What's more realistic, allowing everyone to use the word "Marriage" or > "Married" thus enabling those people who are entitled to those benefits to > get them? Or expecting the Federal and State governments to go through all > the statutes and substitute another word? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 12:49 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: BITTER SCALIA LEAVES U.S. > > > You keep saying people are hung up on NOT being able to use a word, when > you > are hung up about being able to use a word. > > Its just a word, Sam. Why can't homosexual couples use it to legally define > their relationship? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365077 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
