Threaten and impact are not the same thing On Jul 8, 2013 8:49 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If people could be trusted to NOT drive after drinking too much, I would > wholeheartedly agree with you. > > However, people have proven time and time again they cannot be trusted. > > In my opinion, my unalienable right to life trumps your belief in the > 'founding > philosophy freedom of movement'. You drive drunk, you threaten my > unalienable right to life. > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:45 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There can be no crime without a victim > > > > The legislature has exceeded its mandate as it always does. > > > > Also without stopping you they don't know if you're drunk. > > On Jul 8, 2013 8:41 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > If you are driving while under the influence, is that not during the > > > commission of a crime? > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:37 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > According to our founding philosophy freedom of movement, the > > unfettered > > > > ability to travel unmolested is an absolute right. I'm of the > opinion > > > that > > > > this should be extended to driving and even flying. No license needed > > and > > > > only punishable after negligent action has already occurred. > > > > > > > > Unless its during the visible comission of a crime or under a warrant > > > from > > > > a judge, the cops shouldn't be able to stop you much less question > you. > > > Not > > > > even ask your name. > > > > On Jul 8, 2013 8:17 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How is it 'hypothetical safety'? > > > > > > > > > > If a single driver who is over the legal limit is taken off the > road, > > > > does > > > > > that not make it safer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:57 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In America we call that tyrany. > > > > > > > > > > > > Individual rights > the hypothetical safety of the group. > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2013 7:27 AM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having seen the damage a drunk driver can inflict first hand > (and > > > > more > > > > > > > times than I care to remember), I don't feel DUI checkpoints > are > > a > > > > > > > violation of anyone's rights. If one life can be saved by > > > > > inconveniencing > > > > > > > someone with a camera and an agenda...I am all for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Judah McAuley < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having a camera on hand and ready to record is just smart, it > > > isn't > > > > > > > > necessarily trying to start shit. I'm prejudiced in favor of > > the > > > > guy, > > > > > > > > however, as I think that DUI checkpoints of that sort are > > > > > > > unconstitutional > > > > > > > > as they nothing about them that requires any sort of probable > > > > cause. > > > > > > > > Obviously the courts disagree, so that's that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, yeah, I support making life hard for cops at DUI > > > checkpoints, > > > > > for > > > > > > > > screeners at the TSA, etc etc. Know your rights, insist on > your > > > > > rights, > > > > > > > > hold the line. Someone has to and it is pretty obvious that > the > > > > > courts > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > the legislature isn't going to lead the way at this point in > > > > history. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Judah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Scott Stroz < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds to me like the guy who made the video was being an > > ass. > > > > Not > > > > > > > > illegal, > > > > > > > > > but he could have been on his way in much less time had he > > not > > > > > tried > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > 'make a point'. The fact that he had the camera ready to go > > > > pretty > > > > > > much > > > > > > > > > shows he was going to try and start shit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:37 PM, J.J. Merrick <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This happened last night in the county next to mine here > in > > > > > > > Tennessee. > > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > video on Youtube already has half-a-million views and it > is > > > > > blowing > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > > > LiveLeak... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.wkrn.com/story/22770235/dui-checkpoint-video-youtube > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Crazy what times have come to! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -J.J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > | J.J. Merrick > > > > > > > > > > | Owner, Panos Creative > > > > > > > > > > | [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > | p: 615-973-7984 > > > > > > > > > > | http://panos.cc > > > > > > > > > > | http://jeremiahx.com > > > > > > > > > > | http://twitter.com/jeremiahx > > > > > > > > > > <http://facebook.com/jeremiahx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365260 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
