I disagree. Obviously you are court I'm how these things are currently implemented, I'm saying is wrong, its immoral. On Jul 8, 2013 8:47 AM, "Justin Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > According to our founding philosophy freedom of movement, the > > unfettered ability to travel unmolested is an absolute right. > > You're free to walk, then (and you can be stopped in that case too if > you're intoxicated and endangering yourself). When you get into the > car as a driver you're agreeing to submit to any sobriety test > required by law. If a cop pulls you over for a broken tail light are > they hindering your "unfettered ability to travel unmolested" in that > case too? Yes! Because your vehicle isn't up to standards set by law > which can endanger yourself or other drivers. Part of living in a > society is understanding that there are, in fact, OTHER people beside > yourself. Yes, individual liberty is important, but it isn't the > be-all end-all answer to everything. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365258 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
