Not if you interfere with individual rights while doing so. The rights of the individual out weigh the rights of the many here. On Jul 8, 2013 9:18 AM, "Justin Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The first is a property crime as soon as they enter your land. > > Well this is interesting. Why is it a crime? Nobody has been hurt or > endangered. After all, that person has the right to "unfettered" > "unmolested" travel don't they? Oh, right, it's YOUR property which > you have a right to say who may travel upon it or how it's used, so > someone trespassing is a crime. I see. > > So, when you're a part of the public on a public roadway and the > public has agreed through an elected legislature that it's public > roadways are to be used in a certain manner, and someone violates that > manner by driving under the influence of intoxicating substances > thereby endangering other people, how is that violation of the > "public's right" to determine how its roads are used NOT a crime > again? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365282 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
