> Not if you interfere with individual rights while doing so. The rights of > the individual out weigh the rights of the many here.
And that, I believe, is where the core philosophical difference lies. In my opinion you're right most of the time. However, if you're endangering others (e.g. by driving drunk), then I believe you're wrong and the rights of the many to be safe from harm outweighs the individual (who in this case, by the way, is by definition "under the influence" and not entirely acting on their own accord anyway), so the rule of law steps in and lends a hand to keep everyone safe. We could continue this discussion all day long, but since we're going to disagree, I'll just leave it at that. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365284 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
