But he said he didn't approach him. He followed him and Traylon ran. He said he was suspicious because he was walking around in the rain looking around. He also said they always get away.
. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:03 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would call the cops and then let him do their job instead of, you know, > approaching him with a gun....because, call me crazy, something bad might > happen. > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > BS. If you knew there was a string of burglaries near your home and you > saw > > a teenager in a hoodie walking on lawns near houses in the rain you'd > want > > to know why. It wouldn't matter what color he was. > > > > . > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe he was walking right up to the houses to avoid getting soaked! > The > > > boy was not doing ANYTHING wrong, suspicion was only in the mind of > > > Zimmerman. > > > And he acted on that suspicion and killed an unarmed minor! > > > > > > > > > On 23 July 2013 08:44, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Zimmerman lived there and there was a string of burglaries. The guy > was > > > > acting suspicious by walking across lawn right up to the houses. Then > > the > > > > guy disappeared. That's the story we're told. If that's all wrong, > and > > we > > > > have no reason to believe it is, then you have a point. Remember, > last > > > year > > > > Zimmerman publicly pushed to discipline the same cops that > investigated > > > him > > > > for this because they beat a homeless black man. It says a lot about > > his > > > > character, more of an I carer for my community than a wanna be cop. > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He was a guest in the gated community, he had a right to be there. > > > > > > > > > > There is a distinct difference between people who help other people > > and > > > > > 'wanna bes' (or, as my wife reminded earlier, 'yuk yuks'). The > former > > > do > > > > it > > > > > out of the kindness of their hearts, the latter do it for some > > inflated > > > > > sense of 'glory'. > > > > > > > > > > A good example of the former would be those teenagers who chased a > > > would > > > > be > > > > > kidnapper on their bikes last week. > > > > > > > > > > A good example of the later would be George Zimmerman. > > > > > > > > > > In this case, Martin was doing nothing illegal, if Zimmerman had > > 'left > > > it > > > > > to the professionals', Martin would be alive' and we never would > have > > > > known > > > > > either existed. > > > > > > > > > > Still an perplexed that you think Martin would have answered any > > > > questions > > > > > Zimmerman may have asked him. > > > > > > > > > > Person committing a crime by driving drunk - violation of their > > rights > > > to > > > > > be questioned by a police officer. > > > > > > > > > > Person not committing a crime contributed to their own death by not > > > > > answering questions asked by a private citizen. > > > > > > > > > > Simply baffling. > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 9:42 PM, "LRS Scout" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An individual on private property? Who isn't an officer of the > law? > > > No > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a difference you know right? > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a gated community. It is all private property. > > > > > > > > > > > > If he were on a public side walk I'd have a different opinion. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I want to address some stuff you said earlier about wanna > bes. > > > I > > > > > > remember when crime was still really bad and climbing, not > dropping > > > and > > > > > > badly reported. I remember when people walked by rapes and > murders > > > and > > > > > did > > > > > > nothing. You basically talked down to people who go out of there > > way > > > to > > > > > > help other people. Leave it to the professionals right? But the > > > supreme > > > > > > court had found that police don't have any obligation to protect > > you. > > > > > So > > > > > > if that's true you have to protect yourself and we need to be > able > > to > > > > > > protect each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > As a private citizen I can do all kinds of things I could not as > a > > > > > soldier > > > > > > and the same is true of the police. > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 9:28 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you really implying that a person who was doing nothing > > illegal > > > > is > > > > > > > partly to blame for their death because they did not answer > > > questions > > > > > > that > > > > > > > were asked by someone who was NOT a police officer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This coming from the guy who is against DWI check points > because > > > they > > > > > > > violate your rights? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, Tim, that just seems a bit inconsistent. A drunk person > > > > driving > > > > > a > > > > > > > car should not have to answer questions asked by a police > officer > > > at > > > > a > > > > > > DWI > > > > > > > check point, but Martin should have answered questions asked by > > > > > > Zimmerman, > > > > > > > who had absolutely no authority to be asking them to begin > with? > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 9:09 PM, "LRS Scout" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stalked implies his death was the goal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you really think that was Zimmerman initial intent? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think anyone but Larry has suggested that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I thought it was his dad's girlfriends place. He had only > > > just > > > > > > moved > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > and it was only temporary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes Zimmerman should have stayed in the car, but Martin could > > > have > > > > > just > > > > > > > > answered his questions and been about his business too. > > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 6:56 PM, "Judah McAuley" < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was the home where he was staying, with a relative. How > is > > > > that > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > home? And what does it matter? If it was the home of a > > friend, > > > it > > > > > > > > shouldn't > > > > > > > > > make a single bit of difference. You walk to the store to > > grab > > > > some > > > > > > > > > skittles and then walk back to the house, you should not be > > > > stalked > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > killed. Period. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Judah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:21 PM, LRS Scout < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not his home yet again. > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 5:57 PM, "Judah McAuley" < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trayvon Martin was not giving him shit. He was walking > > home > > > > > with > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > bag > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > Skittles to watch a football game with his dad. He > wasn't > > > > > > entering > > > > > > > > > > anyone's > > > > > > > > > > > building. He wasn't stealing anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zimmerman had problems with a caricature of Martin. He > > had > > > > beef > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > idea of someone, not with him. Zimmerman projected his > > > issues > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > else and that someone else paid the price, in this > case, > > > with > > > > > his > > > > > > > > life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's kinda different. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365844 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
