Is that the best you can do?

You really are pathetic.


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> You are such an idiot. Since you think you're such a smart guy how come you
> failed your thesis?What was that, two years of work and money and nothing
> to show for it?
>
> .
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > Thinkers? Really. Then please explain these results.
> >
> > Low-Effort Thought Promotes Political Conservatism
> > Scott Eidelman, Christian S. Crandall, Jeffrey A. Goodman and John C.
> > Blanchar
> > Pers Soc Psychol Bull June 2012 vol. 38 no. 6 808-820
> > http://psp.sagepub.com/content/38/6/808
> >
> > The authors test the hypothesis that low-effort thought promotes
> political
> > conservatism. In Study 1, alcohol intoxication was measured among bar
> > patrons; as blood alcohol level increased, so did political conservatism
> > (controlling for sex, education, and political identification). In Study
> 2,
> > participants under cognitive load reported more conservative attitudes
> than
> > their no-load counterparts. In Study 3, time pressure increased
> > participantsÂ’ endorsement of conservative terms. In Study 4, participants
> > considering political terms in a cursory manner endorsed conservative
> terms
> > more than those asked to cogitate; an indicator of effortful thought
> > (recognition memory) partially mediated the relationship between
> processing
> > effort and conservatism. Together these data suggest that political
> > conservatism may be a process consequence of low-effort thought; when
> > effortful, deliberate thought is disengaged, endorsement of conservative
> > ideology increases.
> > ----
> >
> > And you can download the full study here:
> >
> >
> https://www.evernote.com/shard/s12/sh/25b88c91-94e8-4729-a548-f5b463bb66ce/4be5d6f6e205896490f7c75aa398ca34/res/016c5f91-5e9e-4411-8305-585bdf2a612c/Pers%20Soc%20Psychol%20Bull-2012-Eidelman-0146167212439213.pdf
> >
> > But basically these four experimental studies  argue that conservatives
> are
> > not thinkers. That's confirmed by Jost and Amadio's results with ERP
> > research on cognitive closure.  There are about 7 or 8 different MRI
> > studies (Forbes & Grafman,2010; Westen, Blagov, Harenski, Kilts, &
>  Hamann
> > (2006)) in addition to the Kanai study that has found the same (the
> > Anterior Cingulate Cortex responsible for complex processing and
> tolerance
> > for ambiguity smaller in conservatives), de Zavala, Cislak & Wesolowska
> > research on cognitive closure with European samples, Dane Wendell,
> Matland,
> > & Morrison (in press) with neural inhibition.
> >
> > Overall the data suggests that those who endorse mainly conservative
> > ideology tend to be more motivated by fear and anxiety (increased
> activity
> > in the amygdala and limbic system), devote less processing to tolerating
> > ambiguity and have a higher need for closure (resolution of things for
> > instance). They also are less likely to engage in complex reasoning (ACC
> > differrences). Moreover they tend to prefer low effort thought - the
> > classic low information voter.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We're called thinkers. Why don't you try. BTW, the IPCC is not a group
> of
> > > the worlds top climate scientists, they are politicians.
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Cameron Childress <
> [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:58 AM, GMoney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's a massive hoaxed perpetrated by thousands of scientists across
> > the
> > > > > planet, who speak dozens of different languages, meant
> > > > > to......um..........hmmm.....not really sure what the aim of the
> hoax
> > > > > is...but...IT'S A HOAX!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I do understand the buzzing of a very small number of outliers with
> > very
> > > > questionable political and financial motives - calling this a hoax.
> > What
> > > I
> > > > don't get are the folks who have nothing to gain from calling this a
> > > hoax,
> > > > but continue to aggressively challenge these very thorough research
> > > > reports.
> > > >
> > > > -Cameron
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366546
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to