On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Looking at a few years of data and saying 'look, it is not getting warmer' > is purposely obtuse when you consider that the Earth is billions of years > old. That is akin to taking someones pulse for a nanosecond and concluding > they are dead because you did not feel a heart beat. You can change the scale all you want and it wont fix the numbers. If the scale is too long the little ice ages messes it up. If it's too short you need to "hide the decline." > The 'trend' is that it > is getting warmer. This does not necessarily translate into every year > being warmer than the last, there may be some dips, but over all, it is > getting warmer. > > It isn't and hasn't for 16 plus years. You've been lied to. Even the liars admitted the temperature rise has paused while CO2 has increased exponentially. The correlation isn't there and every knows it. They just won't say it. I am not sold that humans are the sole source of the warming trend, but I > feel confident in saying we are, to some degree, contributing to it. > > Based on what science? > On a side note, anyone who thinks pumping carbon dioxide and other > pollutants into the atmosphere is not something we need to concern > ourselves with is a moron. > > States an extremely ignorant statement. Are you claiming there are people that want to pollute? By using cap and trade laws clean factories in the US are forced to close sending work to China and India where they don't give a rats ass about pollution. That's why this stupid hoax is not only bankrupting legitimate businesses, but it's making "green politician" donors super rich at the cost of clean air. It's amazing that people can be so easily misled into fighting to destroy what they think they're saving. . > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > CO2 has gone way up yet temperatures have leveled off for the last 16-18 > > years. While a smart man would say there is no correlation, the enter > > warming hoax is based on there being one. > > > > Explain that. > > > > . > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > There is evidence that burning fossil fuels leads to decreasing > > > temperatures? I would love to see that evidence - care to share? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > There is absolutely no scientific evidence between burning fossil > fuel > > > and > > > > increased temperatures. However, there is evidence to the opposite > yet > > > > nobody is pretending the science is settled with that or that it's > > even a > > > > real theory. > > > > > > > > So how do you justify your conclusion? Based on what actual science? > > > Please > > > > don't say consensus. > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Scott Stroz > > > --------------- > > > You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can > wonder > > > what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris > > > > > > http://xkcd.com/386/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366557 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
