There is absolutely no scientific evidence between burning fossil fuel and increased temperatures. However, there is evidence to the opposite yet nobody is pretending the science is settled with that or that it's even a real theory.
So how do you justify your conclusion? Based on what actual science? Please don't say consensus. . On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:37 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > You're like an enigma, wrapped in a caricature, wrapped in a stereotype. > > > > ...and I still don't really see any point in engaging in dialog with you > > about any of this. > > > > > That's because there's really no where to go. Scientific study continues > to support the same hypothesis, Sam and others continue to refuse to > believe it. And....that's.....it. Unless or until the scientific research > begins to show different results....we're at a dead end. > > You either accept science, or you don't. Some only accept it when it > matches with their own opinions. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366551 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
