Wait wait...Sam....CO2 now is lower. So you are saying this data that we are seeing is completely wrong.
Can you show me the data you are referring to that shows that CO2 levels were significantly higher 200,000 years ago? I presume that this data will also reflect a cooling or flat temperature during that period? On 17 September 2013 10:33, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Take a look at this chart - > > > > > http://www.daviesand.com/Choices/Precautionary_Planning/New_Data/IceCores1.gifit > > shows a relationship between CO2 levels and temperature. You can see > > that even during 'cooling trends' there were 'spikes' where it was > warmer, > > but the overall trend was that it was getting cooler. The same can be > said > > of the 'warming' periods and 'dips' where it was cooler, but the overall > > trend was that it was getting warmer. > > > > > Bad chart. First, CO2 lags behind temperature. Second, CO2 is lower now > than it was 100k and 300k years ago. I think you need a new source. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:367114 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
