It's trying to explain away the lag. Think about it, if heat released more CO2, and CO2 trapped more heat, the planet would have burned already.
Science baby, try applying some. . On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sam, have you actually read this article? > > It does not support your view that there is no climate change, or that > climate change is not made worse by CO2 emissions. > > "the lag between temperature and CO2 is explained as follows: as ocean > temperatures rise, oceans release CO2 into the atmosphere. In turn, this > release amplifies the warming trend, leading to yet more CO2 being > released. In other words, increasing CO2levels become both the cause and > effect of further warming. This positive feedback is necessary to trigger > the shifts between glacials and interglacials as the effect of orbital > changes is too weak to cause such variation. Additional positive feedbacks > which play an important role in this process include othergreenhouse gases, > and changes in ice sheet cover and vegetation patterns." > > After reading that, can we conclude that your understanding of the > fundamentals involved in climate change seem to be extremely skewed and > incorrect? The items that you think prove your point are either not fully > understood by you, or actually don't support your position. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:367129 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
