you really think that the kid wouldnt have attempted something like this because the teacher might be packing, thats rational Bruce talking, not crazy student.
and you really think the seriousness of the injuries would have been the same had he used a gun instead of a knife? had there been extra guns, the only thing that would have kept the kids any safer would have been for them to wear body armor. We used to have a society where guns were brandished by most people. It was called the wild west. Was it safer than we are today? Why not arm all the teachers with tasers? Why is the answer to gun violence more guns? Does the answer have to be lethal? On Apr 9, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote: > In the case of > this recent event, you are right, a gun would have been a bit much for an > appropriate response, but recall the original thread. Someone implied that > the violence could have been worse had the student had a gun, and so I > implied that if the student had a gun, and so did the teachers/officials, > either the crazy would not have acted at all, or the kids could have had > some degree of protection. No matter how you look at it though, there WILL > be injuries/casualties no matter what. We just need a way to mitigate the > number of casualties/injuries. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:369879 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
