That seems like a double standard, he did his job, the interview was as an individual, that's a pretty steep speech impact especially when you consider the number of people employed even at second hand by the government. On May 19, 2014 12:27 PM, "Judah McAuley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Of course they should be able to fire him. All contracts in that arena are > going to have a clause about upholding the standards of the network and not > bringing any ill repute upon them. You publicly embarrass your employer, > you aren't doing your job well. Therefore you get fired. Pretty easy. > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:21 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > So, A&E should not have been allowed to fire the old red neck? > > On May 19, 2014 12:20 PM, "Judah McAuley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I can understand where you are coming from, I just disagree. I think > that > > > jobs are jobs and you should be judged on your ability to do a job, not > > any > > > other criteria. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370187 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
