He didn't "end up" agreeing, he always believed in AGW and the consensus. He just wanted to prove the paper was bogus and he did multiple times.
. On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > The point still stands. > > The guy that set out to prove a lack of consensus by attacking cook's > study, ended up agreeing with the ultimate findings of that study. > ᧠> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370724 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
