I have not, Rick. Never said I did. I have read the abstract on a half dozen or so of them, and read maybe half of one or two of them....i was able to grasp some of it, others went a little over my head.
So to form my own opinion on this, i try to read articles by scientists that attempt to explain the methods and results of the studies. I figure that's the best a science-loving non-scientist like myself can get. What about you? On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Rick Faircloth <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, GMoney... > > To paraphrase you, when did you "read the hundreds upon hundreds of studies > who's findings support this conclusion, and deem every one of the to be > scientific and credible" ? > > Rick > > > On 6/6/2014 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Science, logic, fact, common sense etc. > >> > >> BTW, I do not reject the possibility that humans can contribute to > >> "climate disruption". > >> What I reject is the so-called proof that it exists or it's mans > >> doing. When someone presents actual science to back up that theory I > >> will have a look. > >> > > You have read the hundreds upon hundreds of studies who's findings > support > > this conclusion, and have deemed every one of them "unscientific"??? > > > > That's impressive. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370735 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
