On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Rick Faircloth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So, after reading only "half" of "one or two" of the "hundreds upon > hundreds of studies, > who's [sic] findings support this conclusion" [ that global warming, now > called 'climate change'] > is real and is caused by human activity, and only "some of the half of > the one or two" > that you did read, did you grasp, while the rest of them "went over your > head", and reading > "articles by scientists", which are not studies themselves, you have > come to the conclusion > that global warming/climate change is a real and present danger to > humanity. > > With your scant review of the studies and only reading, basically, the > "articles of scientists" > who have already drawn their conclusions that global warming/climate > change is real > and dangerous, you have concluded that all the studies concerning > global warming/climate change are, indeed, "scientific" ??? > Did I say that? No. I have not concluded that. I asked Sam if he had, because he said he needed some science first. So i reminded him that there are literally hundreds of scientific studies out there that he can read. So how do you form your opinions on this? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370739 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
