That was awesome

.


On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Rick Faircloth
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So, after reading only "half" of "one or two" of the "hundreds upon
> hundreds of studies,
> who's [sic] findings support this conclusion" [ that global warming, now
> called 'climate change']
> is real and is caused by human activity, and only "some of the half of
> the one or two"
> that you did read, did you grasp, while the rest of them "went over your
> head",  and reading
> "articles by scientists", which are not studies themselves, you have
> come to the conclusion
> that global warming/climate change is a real and present danger to humanity.
>
> With your scant review of the studies and only reading, basically, the
> "articles of scientists"
> who have already drawn their conclusions that global warming/climate
> change is real
> and dangerous, you have  concluded that all the studies concerning
> global warming/climate change are, indeed, "scientific" ???
>
> Your "attempt" to form your "own opinion on this" is inadequate. And,
> more-to-the-point,
> your attempt to disparage Sam's perspective, based on the fact that he
> hasn't
> "read the hundreds and hundreds of studies who's [sic] findings support
> this conclusion"
> seems to bring indictment upon yourself, as well.
>
> Your attempt to form "your own opinion" is barely, if at all, more
> credible than Sam's.
>
> And, even more condemning, you mention that you only read, or tried to
> read and
> understand, reports that SUPPORT your perspective, as well as articles
> summarizing
> support for your perspective, and not studies and articles which OPPOSE your
> point-of-view, indicates that you only want to support your malformed
> conclusion
> that global-warming/climate change is real.
>
> And, in the same way you asked Sam, how many studies have you attempted to
> understand and summary articles have you read that have shown
> global-warming/climate change to be false, especially when the
> conclusion is that
> the phenomenon is NOT "human-caused" ???
>
> And, let's stick to your remarks, rather than try to change the subject
> to what
> I believe, especially since I have not revealed, in fact, what I
> actually believe.
>
> We can discuss my beliefs after handling your remarks.
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370745
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to