I thinking anything trying to be pure to dogma or intent fails automatically.
Chaos rules supreme. On Aug 4, 2014 9:33 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you have a PM, they should be setting priority, not the developer(s). > > When done the right way, agile can be a great way to work. Problem is, very > few do it the 'right' way. Often times when it is 'custom' agile that is > when it fails. > > As I noted earlier the one huge drawback I have experienced is that people > tend to be lazy with requirements gathering because 'we are doing agile. We > can roll with any changes' . > On Aug 4, 2014 9:16 PM, "Eric Roberts" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I just hate agile...period. I cringe whenever a recruiter brings that up > > in > > the listing of job requirements. The thing I don't get is having the > > developer rank the importance...well unless I am getting paid extra to > also > > be the project manager...I don't care...just tell me what we need to do > and > > what order you want it done. Don't waste my time with all this crap. > If I > > wanted to do all of this I would be a manager....something I don't want > to > > have any part of. Most of this shit is just an utter waste of my time > as a > > developer. > > > > Our scrum meetings are what we did yesterday and what we are doing > > today...we have a pretty big team, so it does take a while. My main > > complaint is with Sprint planning and lack of any substantial > > documentation...why am I involved in that. Managers...do your job and > > leave > > me out of it. Most of what I am doing in my current position are bug > > fixes, so that seems to work ok since there is no real designing of > things > > going on...just fix the defects and work on enhancements within the > current > > framework. > > > > I did a gig at Motorola at the beginning of the year. I was building a > > new > > tool from scratch. I asked them how they wanted it designed...th4ey told > > me > > to just build it and do it however I would build the tool...what I felt > was > > best. They wanted to give the developers as much leeway as possible. > So I > > built the tool...after waiting almost 3 months to get my logins...a > > completely different rant...which put me behind already... Also, other > > parts of the system that needed to get built that my part depended on > were > > not getting built in time, so I ended up having to build something that I > > could use to push and pull data, which turned out to be different from > how > > the other developer that was actually building that part envisioned it. > I > > turned it in and they said, well no...we want this done this way and that > > done this way. I am like, well WTH didn't you tell me that to begin > with. > > Had I had that information, I would have structured things a lot > > differently. This was a total train wreck caused by their implementation > > of > > agile and not having a coherent plan on how they wanted the application > > designed and structured. Just leaving it to the developers and then > > bitching when the developers didn't guess the right way is not a way to > run > > things. So then we end up being late on the deliverables. I ended up > > getting let go because I just had no good way to tie in the project with > > all > > the new changes with the way I had originally designed it. What an utter > > cluster fuck. My other experiences with agile have not been that much > > different. I have never worked in a shop where agile works as it says it > > is > > supposed to work on paper. I think agile processing should be banned > > completely and anyone that even brings it up should be tarred and > feathered > > and run off of the planet. > > > > Agile purity...LOL...I think that is a mythological state... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 7:14 PM > > To: cf-community > > Subject: Re: Sometimes... > > > > > > Hour long 'scrum', regardless of the reason, is doing it wrong. > > > > PM should be giving client a briefing based on the daily scrum or if > client > > insists on being on call, they should play by the 'rules'. > > > > Sounds like client doesn't understand how the daily scrum is supposed to > > work and that no one is willing/able to explain it. > > On Aug 4, 2014 1:10 PM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > He might be under similar constraints that my project is given. The > > > client deemed our project "essential" and "critical", and they want > > > observation and updates daily.....so we are forced to have our clients > > > on the phone with us for our daily standups. You can imagine how this > > > complicates things. > > > > > > Agile scrums can be corrupted just like any other process...we've had > > > hour long stand-ups because the client steers them that way. Eric > > > probably has some similar externality that is butchering his Agile > > purity. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hour scrum? > > > > > > > > Yea...you are doing it so very wrong. > > > > > > > > If our daily scrum is more than 5 minutes, I get antsy. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Eric Roberts < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have an hour meeting every day for our scrum, plus a > > > > > retrospective > > > > and a > > > > > scrum panning session during a new sprint. Those meetings can go > > > > > up > > > to 2 > > > > > hrs...I think it is just an excuse for management not to do it's > > job... > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:41 AM > > > > > To: cf-community > > > > > Subject: Re: Sometimes... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again....if you spend that much time in meetings, you are not > > > > > doing > > > > 'agile' > > > > > correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:32 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AMEN!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > Our shop is going full blown Agile, and the meetings are driving > > > > > > me > > > > nuts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website > > > Solutions > > > > > > < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LoL, that is priceless. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm so glad our team isn't agile. Waste of frigging time that > > is... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 days a sprint wasted to meetings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Working with the agile process I see LOL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 1:14 PM > > > > > > > To: cf-community > > > > > > > Subject: Sometimes... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, have to vent. Work's being a bit more "bang head > > > > > > > here"-ish than usual. Guess the next skills I need to develop > > > > > > > to advance my career are telepathy, time travel and insomnia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Happy Friday, folks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Until Later! > > > > > > > C. Hatton Humphrey > > > > > > > http://www.eastcoastconservative.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Every cloud does have a silver lining. Sometimes you just > > > > > > > have to do > > > > > > some > > > > > > > smelting to find it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371919 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
