> Strange. I don't really know what to think sometimes.  I just 
> would love to
> hear someone say thanks to us for once rather than shit on us 
> every time we
> try to help or make things better.
> 
> Tim

Tim, That's as may be. I can sympathize with your point of view. But that
doesn't mean that it's a good idea to go to war with Hussein at this time or
that it will really help or make things better. Some people in power would
like us to believe that. No one here has really addressed yet the recent
observation about popular confusion between Bin Laden and Saddam and I think
it's a good one. The fear of "the other" and the normal human desire for
revenge are at high levels at this time.

But it doesn't necessarily follow that we should act on them. And if you
think about it, people who play on the fears and sadness of ordinary people
for their own ends are not admirable.

Likewise I think it's true that if Bush's motivation was to uphold
international order and agreements then he wouldn't be using cowboy
go-it-alone language.

As free from fumbling as it was, I do think that Bush's State of the Union
address was mostly saying underneath all the rhetoric that Saddam <cfbold>
might </cfbold> be up to something really bad, and to me and I think many
others that's not reason enough to go to war. I am willing to bet that any
evidence remaining to be shown will be evidence of a "could be" scenario.
This is not reason enough to me to inflict the sufferings of war on a nation
which has already suffered greatly, and I think the question is: "Why is it
enough for Bush?".

Despite all the high-falutin' language I think the decision to go war that
they have made is mostly a cold cost/benefit based one. They want to do it
because they can and because it solves several problems for them at once. It
doesn't solve those problems though if we don't buy into it.

The point about clear and present danger that LeCarre makes is a good one,
and it was not addressed in Mr. Lilek's commentary. Nor was the question of
power wrapped in the language of righteousness which to me is always one of
the clear indicators of evil afoot. 

These are dangerous times and there is much to think about - these are only
my 2 cents as someone who is not famous and therefore beyond the kind of
criticism that Mr. Lilek levels at Mr. LeCarre.:-) On that note though I
would like to say that I am in favour of people with a public name speaking
out for what they believe to be right, in fact I would go so far as to say
they bear a greater responsibility than the ordinary Jane Blow.

best wishes and prayers for peace,

Patrick





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to