ROTFL

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:34 AM
Subject: RE: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil


| Who am I?
|
| Ahhh see I feel that I am the highest authority, as pertains to
| interpretaion of political matters.  If I can trust my own judgment, why
| then should I trust someone else's?
|
| Tim
|
| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: Doug White [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:45 AM
| > To: CF-Community
| > Subject: Re: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil
| >
| > Actually, I have read the constitution.  I have likewise read many supreme
| > court
| > decisions that are supposed to be based on that document, but appear to be
| > more
| > based on doctrine as opposed to literal.
| >
| > But, it will take a far more qualified student of the constitution than I
| > to
| > state conclusively as to whet it authorizes and does not authorize.  I
| > would
| > therefore imagine that with a Republican Administration, a Republican
| > congress,
| > and a Republican Supreme court, the administration can most likely do
| > whatever
| > they want to do and it will be considered constitutional.
| >
| > That doesn.t mean I agree with it, because many times I don't, but who am
| > I?
| >
| > ======================================
| > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
| > For CF hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
| > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
| > ======================================
| > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
| >
| > ----- Original Message ----- 
| > From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 6:37 AM
| > Subject: RE: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil
| >
| >
| > | Doug,
| > | Where does the constitution allow the congress to set the executive
| > | as a proxy for anything that falls within its scope?  Simply because
| > they
| > | wrote a law saying the president can send troops witout their approval,
| > | doesn't mean such a law meets the standards imposed by the constitution.
| > | Congress, and congress alone, has the ability to declare war.  Doesn't
| > | matter who voted what funds where.  There is no tacit implicaton of war.
| > | There is also no officially declared war against "terror" contrary to
| > | popular opinion.
| > |
| > | Have you read our constitution?  The invasion was unconstitutional.
| > | It should not have occured in this manner.
| > |
| > | Tim
| > |
| >
| >
| >
| 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to