He does have a point..... Doug White writes:
> ROTFL > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:34 AM > Subject: RE: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil > > > | Who am I? > | > | Ahhh see I feel that I am the highest authority, as pertains to > | interpretaion of political matters. If I can trust my own judgment, why > | then should I trust someone else's? > | > | Tim > | > | > -----Original Message----- > | > From: Doug White [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:45 AM > | > To: CF-Community > | > Subject: Re: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil > | > > | > Actually, I have read the constitution. I have likewise read many supreme > | > court > | > decisions that are supposed to be based on that document, but appear to be > | > more > | > based on doctrine as opposed to literal. > | > > | > But, it will take a far more qualified student of the constitution than I > | > to > | > state conclusively as to whet it authorizes and does not authorize. I > | > would > | > therefore imagine that with a Republican Administration, a Republican > | > congress, > | > and a Republican Supreme court, the administration can most likely do > | > whatever > | > they want to do and it will be considered constitutional. > | > > | > That doesn.t mean I agree with it, because many times I don't, but who am > | > I? > | > > | > ====================================== > | > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > | > For CF hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > | > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > | > ====================================== > | > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > | > > | > ----- Original Message ----- > | > From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 6:37 AM > | > Subject: RE: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil > | > > | > > | > | Doug, > | > | Where does the constitution allow the congress to set the executive > | > | as a proxy for anything that falls within its scope? Simply because > | > they > | > | wrote a law saying the president can send troops witout their approval, > | > | doesn't mean such a law meets the standards imposed by the constitution. > | > | Congress, and congress alone, has the ability to declare war. Doesn't > | > | matter who voted what funds where. There is no tacit implicaton of war. > | > | There is also no officially declared war against "terror" contrary to > | > | popular opinion. > | > | > | > | Have you read our constitution? The invasion was unconstitutional. > | > | It should not have occured in this manner. > | > | > | > | Tim > | > | > | > > | > > | > > | > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
