so you might compare it to the Washington Post? I probably had it mixed up with the Telegraph... I haven't been in the UK in a lot of years.
Wayne Putterill writes: > The Guardian is left of centre I think, It's a broadsheet and as > reputable as any of the serious nationals I suppose. As you might tell > from the website they have a particularly large readership in the new > media and education sectors - if you know a teacher here they probably > read it. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 June 2003 16:12 > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil > > > > > > I dont see the difference between the allegedly accurate > > quote and the allegedly inaccurate quote. They both say oil > > was the deciding factor. > > > > And what the heck in little green footballs? who owns it? I > > had trouble getting past the description of the guardian as a > > "rag"....as best I can tell it's a rather conservative member > > of the mainstream press. Wayne? > > > > Dana > > > > Heald, Tim writes: > > > > > The guardian has even taken down the story now. > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Nick McClure [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:31 AM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: RE: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil > > > > > > > > Wolfowitz was misquoted. > > > > > > > > http://makeashorterlink.com/?M297251D4 > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:42 PM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil > > > > > > > > > > Oil was the main reason for military action against Iraq, a > > > > > leading > > > > White > > > > > House hawk has claimed, confirming the worst fears of those > > > > > opposed to > > > > the > > > > > US-led war. > > > > > > > > > > The US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz - who > > has already > > > > > undermined Tony Blair's position over weapons of mass > > destruction > > > > > (WMD) > > > > by > > > > > describing them as a "bureaucratic" excuse for war - > > has now gone > > > > further > > > > > by claiming the real motive was that Iraq is "swimming" in oil. > > > > > > > > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,970335,00.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
