Your right. Threatening another country to violate their own laws is not a crime in America. I should have remembered that.
> How is this in any way illegal of Bush? > > What US laws does it break? > > Jerry Johnson > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/03 12:09PM >>> > Illegal of Bush as well. He pushed for it and 'force' Sharon into doing it. > Sharon knows that the Israeli public will never accept what's laid out in the > roadmap as it stands so he hides it. As it stands and with the events that are > happening, a war in the middle east is inevitable. Really. > > > > ohhh illegal of sharon, i gotcha thought you meant illegal of shrub. I never > > liked sharon much too hardline but he appears to be softening a bit which is > > a good thing in the long wrong. Maybe the israelis will put Ehud Barak back > > in power now. > > > > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!" > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:45 AM > > Subject: Re: Colin Powell: "This is BS" > > > > > > > Can a law be enacted by the president of the US without it going through > > > congress first? Is there a procedure to do so? Does it take time and have > > to be > > > recorded, etc. > > > The roadmap was withheld from the Israeli government by the prime > > minister. He > > > then brought it to the ruling ministers without the required procedures, > > time, > > > and records being done. A vote was forced and the records of that vote > > (other > > > than it was accepted) is kept secret (the 14 points of disagreement). It > > was > > > then withheld from the larger government body that has to vote on it with > > a > > > statement of 'we have to do it no matter what' (basically). The entire > > process > > > of its 'acceptance' was illegal by the parliamentary standards of a > > sovereign > > > government. > > > Why was this done, because Sharon has turned into as much a mouthpiece for > > Bush > > > as Powell. Do you know that he's releasing terrorists who have 'blood on > > their > > > hands' including the blood of Americans as a 'gesture of good will'? He's > > > bending over backwards to do whatever Bush wants in this while the > > Palestinian > > > side has yet to even say they accept Israel's existence, will stop terror, > > or > > > anything else. > > > > > > > How is it illegal? They don't have to listen to it. People complain when > > > > america doesn't interject in trying to get peace in the middle east then > > > > when we do again its all american is forcing it down their throat. > > Israel > > > > and the PLO could both say no and do it themselves but they are having > > such > > > > goodluck on their own. In fact it was the israeli people who voted that > > > > shrub like hardliner into power and screwed their best chances of peace > > in a > > > > long time. > > > > > > > > I am just curious what you think is illegal about that > > > > > > > > > > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was > > good > > > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people > > off!" > > > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond" > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:04 AM > > > > Subject: Re: Colin Powell: "This is BS" > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, it will be more of the same. The whole road map being > > > > forced > > > > > (illegally) down Israel's throat is being done for one reason and one > > > > reason > > > > > only; re-election. We'll have more Bush, more Cheney, more Powell, > > more of > > > > the > > > > > same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If n fact he is just another mouth piece, no. Last thing we need is > > more > > > > of > > > > > > the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael Dinowitz writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > His backstory once made him very attractive to me as a candidate. > > > > Problem > > > > > is, > > > > > > > he's become just another mouthpiece for the powers that be and is > > just > > > > not > > > > > > > someone I'd vote for anymore. > > > > > > > Just as an aside, let me throw this into the mix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/iraq/powelldoctrine_short > > > > > > > .html > > > > > > > His military doctrine about when and how to use force. Seems he > > feel > > > > it only > > > > > > > applies to himself, not to others.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dunno... I could conceive of voting for him and I am sure as > > hell > > > > not a > > > > > > > > Republican. This may change if he appears to have been > > dishonest. I > > > > also > > > > > > > > wondered if he wasn't the source for that story. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jon hall writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it may appear so on the surface, but I really can't > > agree. > > > > The > > > > > > > > > administration want's Powell to be a "yes man", but obviously > > he > > > > > > > > > doesn't like it. Cheney is the one who originally wrote the BS > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > > > first place. > > > > > > > > > Much has been made about Powell disagreeing with the > > > > administration on > > > > > > > > > a lot of issues. The problem is that he is outnumbered in the > > > > White > > > > > > > > > House with Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rice usually lining up > > against > > > > him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My take is the almost extreme opposite of this somehow being a > > > > sign of > > > > > > > > > weakness on Powell's part. I see it as a sign of strength that > > he > > > > > > > > > disagree's so much with the party line, but refuses to try and > > > > make it > > > > > > > > > an issue of right and wrong in the public eye. Especially > > since > > > > the > > > > > > > > > American voter only really cares about the truth when their > > party > > > > > > > > > doesn't have the White House. I doubt Powell would have gained > > > > more > > > > > > > > > Democratic supporters than Republican supporters he would have > > > > lost if > > > > > > > > > he refused to go along with the White House. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When it comes down to it, the first black man to have a chance > > of > > > > > > > > > becoming President has more important things to worry about > > than > > > > > > > > > whether or not one reason to go to war with Iraq is better > > than > > > > > > > > > another. > > > > > > > > > He has a strong support base on the right currently and can't > > > > > > > > > let the media screw up his image by painting him as a > > maverick, > > > > and I > > > > > > > > > can't help but draw a parallel between David Palmer in the > > show > > > > 24, > > > > > > > > > and Powell. Playing ball now will go a long way in the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > jon > > > > > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Monday, June 2, 2003, 10:24:00 PM, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > MD> Powell, who I once thought I respected, is nothing more > > than a > > > > "yes > > > > > man" > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > MD> Bush and the forces in the state department. He is > > definitely > > > > not in > > > > > > > charge of > > > > > > > > > MD> anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On the evening of February 1, two dozen American officials > > > > gathered > > > > > in a > > > > > > > > > MD> spacious conference room at the Central Intelligence > > Agency in > > > > > Langley, > > > > > > > Va. The > > > > > > > > > MD> time had come to make the public case for war against > > Iraq. > > > > For six > > > > > > > hours that > > > > > > > > > MD> Saturday, the men and women of the Bush administration > > argued > > > > about > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > MD> Secretary of State Colin Powell should--and should > > not--say at > > > > the > > > > > > > United > > > > > > > > > MD> Nations Security Council four days later. Not all the > > secret > > > > > > > intelligence about > > > > > > > > > MD> Saddam Hussein's misdeeds, they found, stood up to close > > > > scrutiny. > > > > > At > > > > > > > one point > > > > > > > > > MD> during the rehearsal, Powell tossed several pages in the > > air. > > > > "I'm > > > > > not > > > > > > > reading > > > > > > > > > MD> this," he declared. "This is bulls- - -." > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/030609/usnews/9intell.htm > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
