And as such they can be sued for employment discrimination. Although G W Shub is trying to get that provision removed.
larry At 02:41 PM 6/12/2003 -0400, Dan Phillips wrote: >That's not so far off base. I have heard of a few Christian owned >companies that business wise, had nothing to do with relligion but sort >of required their employees to be followers of the Bible. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:28 PM >To: CF-Community >Subject: Re: Company bans smoking... > > >That goes to far. What I do on my own time is my business. A smoker who >does not smoke in the office has no 'effect' on his fellows and should >not be prohibited from doing so outside work time. Maybe they can say no >smoking on lunch break due to lingering odor, but that's about it. Oh, I >can see a company having problems with a smoker and insurance policies, >but that's it. > >This is akin to saying "well, we publish Christian books and every >employee has to be a Christian and follow all the rules even when not at >work". Yes, it's an extreme example, but a valid one. > > > > ...even when the employees are not on company premises. > > > > >http://www.news24.com/News24/Backpage/Offbeat/0,5583,2-1343-1347_1372697 >,00.html > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
