Oh, you were talking about the Wen Ho Lee discussion. My bad, it's the $250 
for two years thing where you are being a condescending jerk. In the Wen Ho 
Lee discussion you are merely jerking your knees in the absence of fact.

Dana

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:35:09 -0400, William Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Alrighty, just don't be sore with me when you were reading too much into 
> it.
> I wouldn't want to see anyone shot summarily unless its wartime. Which 
> means
> without a trial.
>
>
> "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good
> with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!"
> Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:20 AM
> Subject: Re: A good american
>
>
>> funny you should mention the term condescending jerk. I never felt bad,
>> Bill. Have a nice day :)
>>
>> Dana
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:27:21 -0400, William Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > *HUGS* hope you feel better today dana :)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was
> good
>> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people
> off!"
>> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Wheatley" 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:22 AM
>> > Subject: Re: A good american
>> >
>> >
>> >> And it's nice to know Canadians can be condescending jerks sometimes
> too
>> > ;)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was
>> >> good
>> >> with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people
>> >> off!"
>> >> Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
>> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney" 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:45 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: A good american
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Bill. Let me see if I can explain this so you can understand. The
>> > military
>> >> > service makes you eligible. You still have to apply, and certify 
>> that
>> > you
>> >> > are not a member of the Nazi party, and a few other things. You 
>> have
>> >> to
>> >> > disclose any criminal history and you have to affirm that you have
>> >> never
>> >> > advocated the overthrow of the US government. And so on for about
>> >> eight
>> >> > pages. You then take the application down to the INS office with 
>> all
>> >> the
>> >> > requisite photographs and --- pay attention now -- the application
> fee
>> > of
>> >> > $250. The fee is not waived for military or any other applicants 
>> that
>> >> I
>> >> > have ever heard.
>> >> >
>> >> > I personally have been eligible for several years, based on time I
>> >> have
>> >> > already lived here. I did not file the paperwork sooner because I 
>> did
>> > not
>> >> > see the importance of voting. This last election has shown me the
>> >> error
>> > of
>> >> > my ways. I will be filing the application. If I enlisted it would
> have
>> >> zero
>> >> > effect on my eligibility. I am eligible already.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if I need to use even smaller words.
>> >> >
>> >> > Dana
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 07:11:29 -0400, William Wheatley
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Oh i know you can get citizenship other ways but see thats a free
>> >> way
>> >> for
>> >> > > you to do it LOL.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I
> was
>> >> good
>> >> > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts 
>> people
>> >> off!"
>> >> > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:06 PM
>> >> > > Subject: Re: A good american
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> I don't need to perform military service to get citizenhip. I 
>> need
>> >> to
>> >> > >> get
>> >> > >> over to the INS office with $250 dollars.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> The plan isnt just proposed. Two of the GIs killed in Iraq had
>> > enlisted
>> >> > > for
>> >> > >> this reason. I think its not a bad idea. Makes it easier for
> people
>> > to
>> >> > >> get
>> >> > >> citizenship.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Dana
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> William Wheatley writes:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > Then you might get citizenship under a law that is being
> proposed
>> > to
>> >> > > give
>> >> > >> > legal aliens who do military service citizenship.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > I think its a great idea
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, 
>> I
>> > was
>> >> > > good
>> >> > >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts
>> >> people
>> >> > > off!"
>> >> > >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
>> >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dana Tierney"
>> >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:43 PM
>> >> > >> > Subject: Re: A good american
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > > well, if you object to killing people why enlist, is my
>> >> question.
>> > I
>> >> > > for
>> >> > >> > > example took great care to never enlist for exactly this
>> >> reason.
>> > If
>> >> > > the US
>> >> > >> > > was invaded then I would be willing to do medic, I guess.
>> >> Might
>> >> > >> still
>> >> > >> > lead
>> >> > >> > > to having to kill someone but it would not be my actual
>> >> function.
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > > Dana
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > > John Stanley writes:
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > > > That's why I specifically stated about the US being 
>> invaded.
>> >> I
>> >> > >> think
>> >> > >> > that if
>> >> > >> > > > you enlist and there is a war in another country, and you
>> > object
>> >> > >> to
>> >> > >> > killing
>> >> > >> > > > another person for whatever reason, you should get another
>> >> job,
>> >> > >> but
>> >> > >> > still on
>> >> > >> > > > the front line, like a medic or something.
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > > Basically it boils down to this: I as a citizen am willing
> to
>> > do
>> >> > >> > whatever my
>> >> > >> > > > country asks of me. I want to punish those who would not 
>> do
>> >> the
>> >> > > same.
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > >> > > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:29 PM
>> >> > >> > > > To: CF-Community
>> >> > >> > > > Subject: Re: A good american
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > > thats if the US is invaded though. (I am not going to go
> into
>> >> > >> > conscientous
>> >> > >> > > > (sp?) objectors; I think some are genuine but if the 
>> country
>> >> is
>> >> > > being
>> >> > >> > > > invaded they should serve *somehow*)
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > > My problem is when people extrapolate this to all other
>> >> > >> situations.
>> >> > > We
>> >> > >> > > > invade Iraq and gee if you don't support this you are a
>> >> coward.
>> > I
>> >> > >> > disagree.
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > > Dana
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > > John Stanley writes:
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > Simple situation:
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > If a country invaded the united states, and everyone had
> to
>> >> > >> choose
>> >> > >> > (which
>> >> > >> > > > is
>> >> > >> > > > > what would happen)
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > You would either:
>> >> > >> > > > > 1. fight for the US (patriot)
>> >> > >> > > > > 2. fight against the US (traitor)
>> >> > >> > > > > 3. not fight (coward)
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > That's it.
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > If you object to fighting on the basis of some personal
>> >> moral
>> >> > > decision
>> >> > >> > > > when
>> >> > >> > > > > your homeland is at stake, then you are a coward.
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > If you are drafted and you choose not to fight then you
> are
>> >> a
>> >> > > coward.
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > >> > > > > From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > >> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:16 PM
>> >> > >> > > > > To: CF-Community
>> >> > >> > > > > Subject: RE: A good american
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > Buddism.
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > If you can call the Dali Lama a coward, you don't know 
>> the
>> >> > >> story.
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > I must admit I find your conviction that anyone who
> doesn't
>> > go
>> >> > >> in
>> >> > > guns
>> >> > >> > > > > blazing is a coward to be very depressing, I hope that
> that
>> >> sort
>> >> > > of
>> >> > >> > > > > ultra aggressive attitude will die out soon.
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > >> > > > > > From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > >> > > > > > Sent: 11 June 2003 16:09
>> >> > >> > > > > > To: CF-Community
>> >> > >> > > > > > Subject: Re: A good american
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > > Of course I hold them in contempt, and likewise term
> them
>> >> > >> > > > > > "Cowards" There is no recognized religion that opposes
>> >> war,
>> >> > >> > > > > > none at all.  In fact all of them have a history of
>> >> > >> > > > > > oppression, war, exploiting the meek, preferring to 
>> keep
>> > the
>> >> > >> > > > > > faithful ignorant, and couching their dogma is
> falsehoods
>> > and
>> >> > >> > > > > > deception. There is no sincere opposition to armed
>> > conflict,
>> >> > >> > > > > > only cowardice.  Genuine Conscientious Objectors are
>> > nothing
>> >> > >> > > > > > more than cowards, and as such are parasitic upon
>> > legitimate
>> >> > >> > > > > > government and its loyal people.  They should all be
>> >> either
>> >> > >> > > > > > exported or executed.
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > > You sadly misquote Ghandi, Mother Theresa and Martin
>> >> Luther
>> >> > >> > > > > > King.  and are completely wrong about the Mennonites.
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > > But, you will survive, because the majority of the
>> > citizenry
>> >> > >> > > > > > will bear arms to defend your rights and 
>> constitutional
>> >> > >> > > > > > protections, as well as permitting you to espouse your
>> >> lies
>> >> > >> > > > > > and deceptions.
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > > ======================================
>> >> > >> > > > > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
>> >> > >> > > > > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
>> >> > >> > > > > > ISP rated:
> http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
>> >> > >> > > > > > ======================================
>> >> > >> > > > > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't
>> > done!
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Larry C.
>> > Lyons"
>> >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > >> > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > >> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:52 AM
>> >> > >> > > > > > Subject: RE: A good american
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > > | So I take it that you hold in contempt those who 
>> have
> a
>> >> > > sincere,
>> >> > >> > > > > > | religious or otherwise, conviction that serving in 
>> the
>> >> > > military is
>> >> > >> > > > > > | wrong. Its great to know that there are those who
> would
>> >> > >> gladly
>> >> > >> > > > > > | persecute others based on their beliefs. Genuine
>> >> > >> conscientious
>> >> > >> > > > > > | objectors would fall under your rubric. People like
>> > Ghandi,
>> >> > > Mother
>> >> > >> > > > > > | Teresa, Martin Luther King etc have those beliefs.
>> >> There
>> >> are
>> >> > > other
>> >> > >> > > > > > | groups like the Mennonites who also have very strong
>> >> > >> > > > > > religious beliefs
>> >> > >> > > > > > | against serving in the military.
>> >> > >> > > > > > |
>> >> > >> > > > > > | Such ignorance is appalling.
>> >> > >> > > > > > |
>> >> > >> > > > > > | larry
>> >> > >> > > > > > |
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to