see, now that was awesome....thanks Kevin... -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:16 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: woo hoo
To add: Republicant Has a very aggressive military with Army Ants Demobees Good at generating a lot of buzz -Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:39 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > Introducing the two newest political parties: > Republicants and Demobees > > Here are just some of the features of the two new parties. > Please feel free to add more. > > Republicants > Pros: > 1. All live in the same nest. > 2. Work together > 3. Only one is in charge > 4. No religious agenda > 5. Only some of them have huge mandibles > 6. The only big business is keeping the nest viable > 7. Everyone shares the parenting of babies > 8. Leaving a scent trail is very important > 9. The leader is a Queen > 10. Can bite and bite and bite. > > Cons: > 1. Attacks and attempts to destroy other > republicant nests > 2. Only some have wings > 3. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > Demobees > Pros: > 1. All can fly > 2. The leader is a Queen > 3. Abortion? We need every baby. > 4. All live in the same nest. > 5. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > 6. Flowers == good > 7. Special interest is honey > Cons: > 1. To figuire out what they are telling you, > you have to understand dancing > 2. Some are a killer species > 3. After they sting you they die > > -----Original Message----- > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:19 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > >Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control others? > > Funny, this is generally a left wing issue. Usually you will > find democrats backing this, and citing health reasons to do > so. Don't get me wrong, the republicans have plenty of other > bad ideas :) > > Timothy Heald > Information Systems Specialist > Overseas Security Advisory Council > U.S. Department of State > 571.345.2235 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:44 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > Our Mayor is pushing hard for a total ban on smoking in > eateries. The main > reason is his campaign contributors. He almost got it > passed, when we have > a > city council election and 7 members were turned out and the > new members will not > go along with it. It seems that about half of the > restaurants in town are > by > the owners' choosing are already smoke-free, as are most of > the fast (spell that > junk) food places. He quickly switched gears and said he > would bring it up for a public referendum, That is getting > nowhere fast as well, because the newbie council members have > rejected the call for an election as well. It seems that the > restaurant association feels the public has plenty of choices > for places to dine, and they are perfectly able to choose the > smoke-free, or the divided smoking/non-smoking restaurants. > This is a city where two (now former) city councilmen, three > members of the local community college board, and several > members of a local school district are under indictment for > official corruption, bribery. etc. It seems that the medical > lobby is biting themselves ever since they railroaded through > (after failing three times) a law to fluoridate the municipal water > supply, using the "cavities in children" argument. Then > they recently > started > another campaign to try to get public funding for free dental > care for the "many children with cavities." When they were > rebutted with the argument, "Why hasn't the fluoride > treatment removed all that risk, as you claimed it would a > couple of years ago." They did not have an answer, and now > there is a movement to repeal that law as well, because it > was a lie to begin with. Our atmospheric environment is right > on the edge of being in non-compliance with EPA regulations > due to smoke from Mexico and Central America in the spring, > and pollution from refineries in the Houston area (200 miles > away) that cigarette smoke is in reality a non-issue, being > so insignificant to the overall air quality situation. Our > power company has just won approval to build an additional > coal-fired power generation plant, with the claim that it > will not add to the deterioration of the air quality. Geez! > When will the truth ever be told? Again, I still believe it > should be the restaurant owner's sole decision, based on his > own market analysis to run a smoke-free or > smoking/non-smoking restaurant, and allow the market decide > to either patronize them or not patronize them. > > Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control > others? Why are non-smokers so stupid that they cannot > decide to not patronize an establishment if smoking is so > offensive to them, and there are plenty of choices to dine in > the atmosphere they choose? > > And I am a non-smoker/non-drinker. > > ====================================== > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > ====================================== > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:48 AM > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > | they are -not- public. they can cater to whomever they wish. if a > restaurant > | owner does not want to permit smokers, or if the public want should > | lend > him > | more profit and he decides he wants this, so be it. a > restaurant owner > | can throw out whatever trash he doesn't want in his establishment. > | it's -his-. > | > | if you take great exception to that, dont : > | > | * Walk down a public street. Carbon Monoxide is terrible for you. > | * Drink beer, milk or eat red meat. These promote fat growth and > | cholesterol. > | * Use a cell phone, or be near an electrical tower. Brain > cancer for > | everyone. > | * on and on and on. > | > | if -you- don't want to be around smokers, that's fine and > dandy. but > | who > are > | you to make demands of the owner of a private business, and > what right > does > | the government have to forbid the use of a legal product on their > premesis. > | if you don't like the menu, you don't have any right to demand a > | change. > get > | up and walk your ass out into the street. just watch out for that > | carbon monoxide. > | > | > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:43 PM > | To: CF-Community > | Subject: RE: woo hoo > | > | > | Restaurants are public as well. If you want customers that is. > | > | And I take great exception to anybody killing me, slowly or quickly. > | > | -------------- > | Ian Skinner > | Web Programmer > | BloodSource > | Sacramento, CA > | > | > | > | > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
