no i mean focus on the fact of the matter instead of picking on someones spelling lol.
I mean No religious agenda thats bullshit, republicants are the religous bugs they line up like the ants they are in support of their big plans. But it was funny up until i realized someone was trying to make a point that it was a quasi-accurate picture of our two parties. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:12 AM Subject: RE: woo hoo > you mean, 'better than' ? :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:12 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > lol gotta do better then that bubba. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:01 AM > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > *point will to a dictionary to learn to spell lying..* :) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:58 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > i didn't see anything in there about republicant's being lieing scumbags > lol > > > > Go back to the source until you can get it right > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:38 AM > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > Introducing the two newest political parties: > > > Republicants and Demobees > > > > > > Here are just some of the features of the two new parties. Please feel > > free > > > to add more. > > > > > > Republicants > > > Pros: > > > 1. All live in the same nest. > > > 2. Work together > > > 3. Only one is in charge > > > 4. No religious agenda > > > 5. Only some of them have huge mandibles > > > 6. The only big business is keeping the nest viable > > > 7. Everyone shares the parenting of babies > > > 8. Leaving a scent trail is very important > > > 9. The leader is a Queen > > > 10. Can bite and bite and bite. > > > > > > Cons: > > > 1. Attacks and attempts to destroy other republicant nests > > > 2. Only some have wings > > > 3. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > > > > Demobees > > > Pros: > > > 1. All can fly > > > 2. The leader is a Queen > > > 3. Abortion? We need every baby. > > > 4. All live in the same nest. > > > 5. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > 6. Flowers == good > > > 7. Special interest is honey > > > Cons: > > > 1. To figuire out what they are telling you, you have to > > > understand dancing > > > 2. Some are a killer species > > > 3. After they sting you they die > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:19 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > >Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control others? > > > > > > Funny, this is generally a left wing issue. Usually you will find > > democrats > > > backing this, and citing health reasons to do so. Don't get me wrong, > the > > > republicans have plenty of other bad ideas :) > > > > > > Timothy Heald > > > Information Systems Specialist > > > Overseas Security Advisory Council > > > U.S. Department of State > > > 571.345.2235 > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:44 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > Our Mayor is pushing hard for a total ban on smoking in eateries. The > > main > > > reason is his campaign contributors. He almost got it passed, when we > > have > > > a > > > city council election and 7 members were turned out and the new members > > will > > > not > > > go along with it. It seems that about half of the restaurants in town > > are > > > by > > > the owners' choosing are already smoke-free, as are most of the fast > > (spell > > > that > > > junk) food places. He quickly switched gears and said he would bring it > > up > > > for > > > a public referendum, That is getting nowhere fast as well, because the > > > newbie > > > council members have rejected the call for an election as well. It > seems > > > that > > > the restaurant association feels the public has plenty of choices for > > places > > > to > > > dine, and they are perfectly able to choose the smoke-free, or the > divided > > > smoking/non-smoking restaurants. > > > This is a city where two (now former) city councilmen, three members of > > the > > > local community college board, and several members of a local school > > > district > > > are under indictment for official corruption, bribery. etc. > > > It seems that the medical lobby is biting themselves ever since they > > > railroaded > > > through (after failing three times) a law to fluoridate the municipal > > water > > > supply, using the "cavities in children" argument. Then they recently > > > started > > > another campaign to try to get public funding for free dental care for > the > > > "many > > > children with cavities." When they were rebutted with the argument, > "Why > > > hasn't > > > the fluoride treatment removed all that risk, as you claimed it would a > > > couple > > > of years ago." They did not have an answer, and now there is a movement > > to > > > repeal that law as well, because it was a lie to begin with. > > > Our atmospheric environment is right on the edge of being in > > non-compliance > > > with > > > EPA regulations due to smoke from Mexico and Central America in the > > spring, > > > and > > > pollution from refineries in the Houston area (200 miles away) that > > > cigarette > > > smoke is in reality a non-issue, being so insignificant to the overall > air > > > quality situation. Our power company has just won approval to build an > > > additional coal-fired power generation plant, with the claim that it > will > > > not > > > add to the deterioration of the air quality. Geez! When will the truth > > > ever be > > > told? > > > Again, I still believe it should be the restaurant owner's sole > decision, > > > based > > > on his own market analysis to run a smoke-free or smoking/non-smoking > > > restaurant, and allow the market decide to either patronize them or not > > > patronize them. > > > > > > Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control others? > Why > > > are > > > non-smokers so stupid that they cannot decide to not patronize an > > > establishment > > > if smoking is so offensive to them, and there are plenty of choices to > > dine > > > in > > > the atmosphere they choose? > > > > > > And I am a non-smoker/non-drinker. > > > > > > ====================================== > > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > > > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > > > ====================================== > > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:48 AM > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > | they are -not- public. they can cater to whomever they wish. if a > > > restaurant > > > | owner does not want to permit smokers, or if the public want should > lend > > > him > > > | more profit and he decides he wants this, so be it. a restaurant owner > > can > > > | throw out whatever trash he doesn't want in his establishment. > > it's -his-. > > > | > > > | if you take great exception to that, dont : > > > | > > > | * Walk down a public street. Carbon Monoxide is terrible for you. > > > | * Drink beer, milk or eat red meat. These promote fat growth and > > > | cholesterol. > > > | * Use a cell phone, or be near an electrical tower. Brain cancer for > > > | everyone. > > > | * on and on and on. > > > | > > > | if -you- don't want to be around smokers, that's fine and dandy. but > who > > > are > > > | you to make demands of the owner of a private business, and what right > > > does > > > | the government have to forbid the use of a legal product on their > > > premesis. > > > | if you don't like the menu, you don't have any right to demand a > change. > > > get > > > | up and walk your ass out into the street. just watch out for that > carbon > > > | monoxide. > > > | > > > | > > > | -----Original Message----- > > > | From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > | Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:43 PM > > > | To: CF-Community > > > | Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > | > > > | > > > | Restaurants are public as well. If you want customers that is. > > > | > > > | And I take great exception to anybody killing me, slowly or quickly. > > > | > > > | -------------- > > > | Ian Skinner > > > | Web Programmer > > > | BloodSource > > > | Sacramento, CA > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
