Oh good sign me up!!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:39 AM Subject: RE: woo hoo > they're not pro-smoking, they're anti non-smoking. > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:39 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > LOL. > > I liked what i've heard about them from tim, i would hate to think they are > a pro-smoker party thats an issue that would keep me from joining them > unfortunately. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:27 AM > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > i agree, was funny. that's why i attempt to distance myself from both as > > much as possible. > > > > i saw a great sticker outside of cvs yesterday : > > > > 'more people smoke than voted for clinton. join the libertarian party > > today!' > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:26 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > no i mean focus on the fact of the matter instead of picking on someones > > spelling lol. > > > > I mean No religious agenda > > > > thats bullshit, republicants are the religous bugs they line up like the > > ants they are in support of their big plans. But it was funny up until i > > realized someone was trying to make a point that it was a quasi-accurate > > picture of our two parties. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:12 AM > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > you mean, 'better than' ? :) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:12 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > lol gotta do better then that bubba. > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:01 AM > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > *point will to a dictionary to learn to spell lying..* :) > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:58 AM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > i didn't see anything in there about republicant's being lieing > scumbags > > > lol > > > > > > > > Go back to the source until you can get it right > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:38 AM > > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > > Introducing the two newest political parties: > > > > > Republicants and Demobees > > > > > > > > > > Here are just some of the features of the two new parties. Please > feel > > > > free > > > > > to add more. > > > > > > > > > > Republicants > > > > > Pros: > > > > > 1. All live in the same nest. > > > > > 2. Work together > > > > > 3. Only one is in charge > > > > > 4. No religious agenda > > > > > 5. Only some of them have huge mandibles > > > > > 6. The only big business is keeping the nest viable > > > > > 7. Everyone shares the parenting of babies > > > > > 8. Leaving a scent trail is very important > > > > > 9. The leader is a Queen > > > > > 10. Can bite and bite and bite. > > > > > > > > > > Cons: > > > > > 1. Attacks and attempts to destroy other republicant nests > > > > > 2. Only some have wings > > > > > 3. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > > > > > > > > Demobees > > > > > Pros: > > > > > 1. All can fly > > > > > 2. The leader is a Queen > > > > > 3. Abortion? We need every baby. > > > > > 4. All live in the same nest. > > > > > 5. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > > > 6. Flowers == good > > > > > 7. Special interest is honey > > > > > Cons: > > > > > 1. To figuire out what they are telling you, you have to > > > > > understand dancing > > > > > 2. Some are a killer species > > > > > 3. After they sting you they die > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:19 AM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control > others? > > > > > > > > > > Funny, this is generally a left wing issue. Usually you will find > > > > democrats > > > > > backing this, and citing health reasons to do so. Don't get me > wrong, > > > the > > > > > republicans have plenty of other bad ideas :) > > > > > > > > > > Timothy Heald > > > > > Information Systems Specialist > > > > > Overseas Security Advisory Council > > > > > U.S. Department of State > > > > > 571.345.2235 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:44 PM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Our Mayor is pushing hard for a total ban on smoking in eateries. > > The > > > > main > > > > > reason is his campaign contributors. He almost got it passed, when > > we > > > > have > > > > > a > > > > > city council election and 7 members were turned out and the new > > members > > > > will > > > > > not > > > > > go along with it. It seems that about half of the restaurants in > > town > > > > are > > > > > by > > > > > the owners' choosing are already smoke-free, as are most of the fast > > > > (spell > > > > > that > > > > > junk) food places. He quickly switched gears and said he would > bring > > it > > > > up > > > > > for > > > > > a public referendum, That is getting nowhere fast as well, because > > the > > > > > newbie > > > > > council members have rejected the call for an election as well. It > > > seems > > > > > that > > > > > the restaurant association feels the public has plenty of choices > for > > > > places > > > > > to > > > > > dine, and they are perfectly able to choose the smoke-free, or the > > > divided > > > > > smoking/non-smoking restaurants. > > > > > This is a city where two (now former) city councilmen, three members > > of > > > > the > > > > > local community college board, and several members of a local school > > > > > district > > > > > are under indictment for official corruption, bribery. etc. > > > > > It seems that the medical lobby is biting themselves ever since they > > > > > railroaded > > > > > through (after failing three times) a law to fluoridate the > municipal > > > > water > > > > > supply, using the "cavities in children" argument. Then they > > recently > > > > > started > > > > > another campaign to try to get public funding for free dental care > for > > > the > > > > > "many > > > > > children with cavities." When they were rebutted with the argument, > > > "Why > > > > > hasn't > > > > > the fluoride treatment removed all that risk, as you claimed it > would > > a > > > > > couple > > > > > of years ago." They did not have an answer, and now there is a > > movement > > > > to > > > > > repeal that law as well, because it was a lie to begin with. > > > > > Our atmospheric environment is right on the edge of being in > > > > non-compliance > > > > > with > > > > > EPA regulations due to smoke from Mexico and Central America in the > > > > spring, > > > > > and > > > > > pollution from refineries in the Houston area (200 miles away) that > > > > > cigarette > > > > > smoke is in reality a non-issue, being so insignificant to the > overall > > > air > > > > > quality situation. Our power company has just won approval to build > > an > > > > > additional coal-fired power generation plant, with the claim that it > > > will > > > > > not > > > > > add to the deterioration of the air quality. Geez! When will the > > truth > > > > > ever be > > > > > told? > > > > > Again, I still believe it should be the restaurant owner's sole > > > decision, > > > > > based > > > > > on his own market analysis to run a smoke-free or > smoking/non-smoking > > > > > restaurant, and allow the market decide to either patronize them or > > not > > > > > patronize them. > > > > > > > > > > Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control > others? > > > Why > > > > > are > > > > > non-smokers so stupid that they cannot decide to not patronize an > > > > > establishment > > > > > if smoking is so offensive to them, and there are plenty of choices > to > > > > dine > > > > > in > > > > > the atmosphere they choose? > > > > > > > > > > And I am a non-smoker/non-drinker. > > > > > > > > > > ====================================== > > > > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > > > > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > > > > > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > > > > > ====================================== > > > > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:48 AM > > > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > | they are -not- public. they can cater to whomever they wish. if a > > > > > restaurant > > > > > | owner does not want to permit smokers, or if the public want > should > > > lend > > > > > him > > > > > | more profit and he decides he wants this, so be it. a restaurant > > owner > > > > can > > > > > | throw out whatever trash he doesn't want in his establishment. > > > > it's -his-. > > > > > | > > > > > | if you take great exception to that, dont : > > > > > | > > > > > | * Walk down a public street. Carbon Monoxide is terrible for you. > > > > > | * Drink beer, milk or eat red meat. These promote fat growth and > > > > > | cholesterol. > > > > > | * Use a cell phone, or be near an electrical tower. Brain cancer > for > > > > > | everyone. > > > > > | * on and on and on. > > > > > | > > > > > | if -you- don't want to be around smokers, that's fine and dandy. > but > > > who > > > > > are > > > > > | you to make demands of the owner of a private business, and what > > right > > > > > does > > > > > | the government have to forbid the use of a legal product on their > > > > > premesis. > > > > > | if you don't like the menu, you don't have any right to demand a > > > change. > > > > > get > > > > > | up and walk your ass out into the street. just watch out for that > > > carbon > > > > > | monoxide. > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | -----Original Message----- > > > > > | From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > | Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:43 PM > > > > > | To: CF-Community > > > > > | Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | Restaurants are public as well. If you want customers that is. > > > > > | > > > > > | And I take great exception to anybody killing me, slowly or > quickly. > > > > > | > > > > > | -------------- > > > > > | Ian Skinner > > > > > | Web Programmer > > > > > | BloodSource > > > > > | Sacramento, CA > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
