I'm guessing you have video tools as well? -----Original Message----- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:45 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: woo hoo
I'm just wondering what 'training' you'll get. I want the video rights to this. Perfect way to raise community funds. :) > Are you accepting applications for students? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:33 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > As well they should. Clearly you need religious training <g> > > Dana > > John Stanley writes: > > > they're bugs...they only worship the queen.... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > no religious agenda? C'mon :) > > > > Dana > > > > John Stanley writes: > > > > > Introducing the two newest political parties: Republicants and > > > Demobees > > > > > > Here are just some of the features of the two new parties. Please > > > feel > > free > > > to add more. > > > > > > Republicants > > > Pros: > > > 1. All live in the same nest. > > > 2. Work together > > > 3. Only one is in charge > > > 4. No religious agenda > > > 5. Only some of them have huge mandibles > > > 6. The only big business is keeping the nest viable > > > 7. Everyone shares the parenting of babies > > > 8. Leaving a scent trail is very important > > > 9. The leader is a Queen > > > 10. Can bite and bite and bite. > > > > > > Cons: > > > 1. Attacks and attempts to destroy other republicant nests 2. Only > > > some have wings 3. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > > > > Demobees > > > Pros: > > > 1. All can fly > > > 2. The leader is a Queen > > > 3. Abortion? We need every baby. > > > 4. All live in the same nest. > > > 5. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > 6. Flowers == good > > > 7. Special interest is honey > > > Cons: > > > 1. To figuire out what they are telling you, you have to > > > understand dancing 2. Some are a killer species > > > 3. After they sting you they die > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:19 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > >Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control > > > >others? > > > > > > Funny, this is generally a left wing issue. Usually you will find > > democrats > > > backing this, and citing health reasons to do so. Don't get me > > > wrong, > the > > > republicans have plenty of other bad ideas :) > > > > > > Timothy Heald > > > Information Systems Specialist > > > Overseas Security Advisory Council > > > U.S. Department of State > > > 571.345.2235 > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:44 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > Our Mayor is pushing hard for a total ban on smoking in eateries. The > > main > > > reason is his campaign contributors. He almost got it passed, when we > > have > > > a > > > city council election and 7 members were turned out and the new > > > members > > will > > > not > > > go along with it. It seems that about half of the restaurants in town > > are > > > by > > > the owners' choosing are already smoke-free, as are most of the > > > fast > > (spell > > > that > > > junk) food places. He quickly switched gears and said he would > > > bring it > > up > > > for > > > a public referendum, That is getting nowhere fast as well, > > > because the newbie council members have rejected the call for an > > > election as well. It > seems > > > that > > > the restaurant association feels the public has plenty of choices > > > for > > places > > > to > > > dine, and they are perfectly able to choose the smoke-free, or the > divided > > > smoking/non-smoking restaurants. > > > This is a city where two (now former) city councilmen, three > > > members of > > the > > > local community college board, and several members of a local > > > school district are under indictment for official corruption, > > > bribery. etc. It seems that the medical lobby is biting themselves > > > ever since they railroaded > > > through (after failing three times) a law to fluoridate the municipal > > water > > > supply, using the "cavities in children" argument. Then they recently > > > started > > > another campaign to try to get public funding for free dental care > > > for > the > > > "many > > > children with cavities." When they were rebutted with the > > > argument, > "Why > > > hasn't > > > the fluoride treatment removed all that risk, as you claimed it > > > would a couple of years ago." They did not have an answer, and > > > now there is a movement > > to > > > repeal that law as well, because it was a lie to begin with. Our > > > atmospheric environment is right on the edge of being in > > non-compliance > > > with > > > EPA regulations due to smoke from Mexico and Central America in > > > the > > spring, > > > and > > > pollution from refineries in the Houston area (200 miles away) > > > that cigarette smoke is in reality a non-issue, being so > > > insignificant to the overall > air > > > quality situation. Our power company has just won approval to > > > build an additional coal-fired power generation plant, with the > > > claim that it > will > > > not > > > add to the deterioration of the air quality. Geez! When will the > > > truth ever be told? > > > Again, I still believe it should be the restaurant owner's sole > decision, > > > based > > > on his own market analysis to run a smoke-free or > > > smoking/non-smoking restaurant, and allow the market decide to > > > either patronize them or not patronize them. > > > > > > Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control > > > others? > Why > > > are > > > non-smokers so stupid that they cannot decide to not patronize an > > > establishment if smoking is so offensive to them, and there are > > > plenty of choices to > > dine > > > in > > > the atmosphere they choose? > > > > > > And I am a non-smoker/non-drinker. > > > > > > ====================================== > > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > > > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > > > ====================================== > > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:48 AM > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > | they are -not- public. they can cater to whomever they wish. if > > > | a > > > restaurant > > > | owner does not want to permit smokers, or if the public want > > > | should > lend > > > him > > > | more profit and he decides he wants this, so be it. a restaurant > > > | owner > > can > > > | throw out whatever trash he doesn't want in his establishment. > > > | it's > > -his-. > > > | > > > | if you take great exception to that, dont : > > > | > > > | * Walk down a public street. Carbon Monoxide is terrible for > > > | you. > > > | * Drink beer, milk or eat red meat. These promote fat growth and > > > | cholesterol. > > > | * Use a cell phone, or be near an electrical tower. Brain cancer for > > > | everyone. > > > | * on and on and on. > > > | > > > | if -you- don't want to be around smokers, that's fine and dandy. > > > | but > who > > > are > > > | you to make demands of the owner of a private business, and what > > > | right > > > does > > > | the government have to forbid the use of a legal product on > > > | their > > > premesis. > > > | if you don't like the menu, you don't have any right to demand a > change. > > > get > > > | up and walk your ass out into the street. just watch out for > > > | that > carbon > > > | monoxide. > > > | > > > | > > > | -----Original Message----- > > > | From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > | Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:43 PM > > > | To: CF-Community > > > | Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > | > > > | > > > | Restaurants are public as well. If you want customers that is. > > > | > > > | And I take great exception to anybody killing me, slowly or > > > | quickly. > > > | > > > | -------------- > > > | Ian Skinner > > > | Web Programmer > > > | BloodSource > > > | Sacramento, CA > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
