should they? no. people have the responsability of not eating rotten food. however, people should also have the right to sue an establishment if they become seriously ill from such things. a nice, government monitored civil suit.
does the government currently do this? yes. boo. --d. -----Original Message----- From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:48 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: woo hoo Lets step away from should it be considered public or private, let me ask this. Does the government have the authority to require restaurants meet other standards? For example: Building occupancy limits, food quality standards (no war chicken, sour milk, etc) Does the government have the right place those regulations on restaurants? > -----Original Message----- > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:11 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > It defined public, not public property. You have to remember we are > talking > about real property. Real estate. Land. Who decides what' is then > public > and private land, don't we have some protections against government > intrusion on private property? Should a restaurant be considered public > or > private property? Not even is it, but should it? > > Additionally, do you have nothing to say about the comments I made in > response to your links? Geez, where has debate gone? > > Timothy Heald > Information Systems Specialist > Overseas Security Advisory Council > U.S. Department of State > 571.345.2235 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
