Are you accepting applications for students? -----Original Message----- From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:33 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: woo hoo
As well they should. Clearly you need religious training <g> Dana John Stanley writes: > they're bugs...they only worship the queen.... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:07 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > no religious agenda? C'mon :) > > Dana > > John Stanley writes: > > > Introducing the two newest political parties: > > Republicants and Demobees > > > > Here are just some of the features of the two new parties. Please feel > free > > to add more. > > > > Republicants > > Pros: > > 1. All live in the same nest. > > 2. Work together > > 3. Only one is in charge > > 4. No religious agenda > > 5. Only some of them have huge mandibles > > 6. The only big business is keeping the nest viable > > 7. Everyone shares the parenting of babies > > 8. Leaving a scent trail is very important > > 9. The leader is a Queen > > 10. Can bite and bite and bite. > > > > Cons: > > 1. Attacks and attempts to destroy other republicant nests > > 2. Only some have wings > > 3. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > > Demobees > > Pros: > > 1. All can fly > > 2. The leader is a Queen > > 3. Abortion? We need every baby. > > 4. All live in the same nest. > > 5. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > 6. Flowers == good > > 7. Special interest is honey > > Cons: > > 1. To figuire out what they are telling you, you have to > > understand dancing > > 2. Some are a killer species > > 3. After they sting you they die > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:19 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > >Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control others? > > > > Funny, this is generally a left wing issue. Usually you will find > democrats > > backing this, and citing health reasons to do so. Don't get me wrong, the > > republicans have plenty of other bad ideas :) > > > > Timothy Heald > > Information Systems Specialist > > Overseas Security Advisory Council > > U.S. Department of State > > 571.345.2235 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:44 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > Our Mayor is pushing hard for a total ban on smoking in eateries. The > main > > reason is his campaign contributors. He almost got it passed, when we > have > > a > > city council election and 7 members were turned out and the new members > will > > not > > go along with it. It seems that about half of the restaurants in town > are > > by > > the owners' choosing are already smoke-free, as are most of the fast > (spell > > that > > junk) food places. He quickly switched gears and said he would bring it > up > > for > > a public referendum, That is getting nowhere fast as well, because the > > newbie > > council members have rejected the call for an election as well. It seems > > that > > the restaurant association feels the public has plenty of choices for > places > > to > > dine, and they are perfectly able to choose the smoke-free, or the divided > > smoking/non-smoking restaurants. > > This is a city where two (now former) city councilmen, three members of > the > > local community college board, and several members of a local school > > district > > are under indictment for official corruption, bribery. etc. > > It seems that the medical lobby is biting themselves ever since they > > railroaded > > through (after failing three times) a law to fluoridate the municipal > water > > supply, using the "cavities in children" argument. Then they recently > > started > > another campaign to try to get public funding for free dental care for the > > "many > > children with cavities." When they were rebutted with the argument, "Why > > hasn't > > the fluoride treatment removed all that risk, as you claimed it would a > > couple > > of years ago." They did not have an answer, and now there is a movement > to > > repeal that law as well, because it was a lie to begin with. > > Our atmospheric environment is right on the edge of being in > non-compliance > > with > > EPA regulations due to smoke from Mexico and Central America in the > spring, > > and > > pollution from refineries in the Houston area (200 miles away) that > > cigarette > > smoke is in reality a non-issue, being so insignificant to the overall air > > quality situation. Our power company has just won approval to build an > > additional coal-fired power generation plant, with the claim that it will > > not > > add to the deterioration of the air quality. Geez! When will the truth > > ever be > > told? > > Again, I still believe it should be the restaurant owner's sole decision, > > based > > on his own market analysis to run a smoke-free or smoking/non-smoking > > restaurant, and allow the market decide to either patronize them or not > > patronize them. > > > > Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control others? Why > > are > > non-smokers so stupid that they cannot decide to not patronize an > > establishment > > if smoking is so offensive to them, and there are plenty of choices to > dine > > in > > the atmosphere they choose? > > > > And I am a non-smoker/non-drinker. > > > > ====================================== > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > > ====================================== > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:48 AM > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > | they are -not- public. they can cater to whomever they wish. if a > > restaurant > > | owner does not want to permit smokers, or if the public want should lend > > him > > | more profit and he decides he wants this, so be it. a restaurant owner > can > > | throw out whatever trash he doesn't want in his establishment. it's > -his-. > > | > > | if you take great exception to that, dont : > > | > > | * Walk down a public street. Carbon Monoxide is terrible for you. > > | * Drink beer, milk or eat red meat. These promote fat growth and > > | cholesterol. > > | * Use a cell phone, or be near an electrical tower. Brain cancer for > > | everyone. > > | * on and on and on. > > | > > | if -you- don't want to be around smokers, that's fine and dandy. but who > > are > > | you to make demands of the owner of a private business, and what right > > does > > | the government have to forbid the use of a legal product on their > > premesis. > > | if you don't like the menu, you don't have any right to demand a change. > > get > > | up and walk your ass out into the street. just watch out for that carbon > > | monoxide. > > | > > | > > | -----Original Message----- > > | From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > | Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:43 PM > > | To: CF-Community > > | Subject: RE: woo hoo > > | > > | > > | Restaurants are public as well. If you want customers that is. > > | > > | And I take great exception to anybody killing me, slowly or quickly. > > | > > | -------------- > > | Ian Skinner > > | Web Programmer > > | BloodSource > > | Sacramento, CA > > | > > | > > | > > | > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
