I understand your point, but chafe at the example. "Have the troops starve"? Are you seriously suggesting that we entered Iraq with no plan to feed our troops? That the only way to feed them was to forfeit legitimate processes for "last minute emergency decisions" involving politically valuable, no bid contracts?
I'm sorry, but I always suspect unwarrantedly extreme arguments. They tend to mask illicit behavior. Jim Davis > -----Original Message----- > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:13 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: From the Washington Post: Halliburton's Deals Greater Than Th > ought > > By having proved yourself on multiple deployments. > > These were last minute emergency decisions. Would you rather have seen > the > troops starve from not have the proper logistics in place? > > Tim > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:53 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: From the Washington Post: Halliburton's Deals Greater Than > Thought > > > Kevin Schmidt wrote: > > > >Haliburton is the best at what it does, period, that's they win > >contracts. > > How do you win a "no bid" contract? > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
