Sounds ok to me, if the guy whose face your about to smash in had attacked you and you were defending your self and your family.
Tim -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:33 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: From the Washington Post: Halliburton's Deals Greater Than Th ought I remember reading a news article that said the US had started taking bids for the reconstruction of Iraq... prior to any declaration of war or the deployment of any troops there... Which seemed not only backward in a business sense, but also just plain evil... It's like saying "don't worry, I've already started taking bids from Dr's to reconstruct your face after I smash it in with this lead pipe". ike ------ Original Message ------ From: Haggerty, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Aug 28, 2003 01:07 PM Subject: RE: From the Washington Post: Halliburton's Deals Greater Than Th ought >Well Jim, a public bidding process would probably have been somewhat >suspicious considering we were 'debating' whether or not to go to war... > >M > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:52 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: RE: From the Washington Post: Halliburton's Deals >> Greater Than Th ought >> >> >> I understand your point, but chafe at the example. >> >> "Have the troops starve"? Are you seriously suggesting that >> we entered Iraq with no plan to feed our troops? That the >> only way to feed them was to forfeit legitimate processes for >> "last minute emergency decisions" involving politically >> valuable, no bid contracts? >> >> I'm sorry, but I always suspect unwarrantedly extreme >> arguments. They tend to mask illicit behavior. >> >> Jim Davis >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:13 AM >> > To: CF-Community >> > Subject: RE: From the Washington Post: Halliburton's Deals Greater >> Than Th >> > ought >> > >> > By having proved yourself on multiple deployments. >> > >> > These were last minute emergency decisions. Would you rather have >> seen >> > the >> > troops starve from not have the proper logistics in place? >> > >> > Tim >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:53 AM >> > To: CF-Community >> > Subject: From the Washington Post: Halliburton's Deals Greater Than >> > Thought >> > >> > >> > Kevin Schmidt wrote: >> > > >> > >Haliburton is the best at what it does, period, that's they win >> > >contracts. >> > >> > How do you win a "no bid" contract? >> > >> > Jochem >> > >> > >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
