But if we're going to talk laws, then how would that work?
>
> "Thou shalt not allow IT operations to move overseas."
>
> So, we need to define what IT is.
>
> So, we need to how to determine if a person works in IT.
[snip]
And we're back to the nitty-gritty implementation questions I asked early
that you opted to dodge. I asked them in good faith knowing that this is
where it would end up.
> > (I've got nothing against Canada. I'm just making the point that
> > it may not
> > be in US interests to protect Canadian workers.)
>
> Sure it is. We're a lot closer to the US than India/China is. We have a
large skilled, english speaking workforce. We have a liberal government
that would be more than happy to provide free training to the masses. By
protecting just yourselves, you've made it pretty easy for US companies to
move IT operations across the border.
>
So it's in US interests to move jobs to Canada? If we're going to legislate,
why not go whole hog and protect US workers?
-Kevin
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
