make in profit go?
The fact that American Indians would be more poorly trained than their
Indian counterparts is a huge Con, and one which would most likely bust
the idea.
Perhaps the American Indians could be urged to take a look at the world
market and the skillsets required, and train in those skillsets as the
Indians have done.
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 5:44 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Who I'm voting for
PRO:
1) The money stays in the US and benefits some of our most
economically depressed citizens. Business trips when desirable are
also less expensive.
2) American Indians by and large speak English rather than
English-ASL, which will mitigate communication gaps and errors in
translation.
3) The US Government offers financial assistance in the form of grants
and I believe some loans to minority businesses.
CON:
1) American Indian workers are probably still slightly more expensive
than workers on the Indian sub-continent.
2) American Indian workers will likely require more training. I'm
banking on their being eager learners. :)
3) Some reservations may not have pre-existing infrastructure to make
remote networking easy.
I'm not saying it's a complete solution to anyone's problems. I do
think the idea deserves attention, possibly even legislative
attention.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
