>Hey Bill,
>
>There is a check box in Outlook that has it automatically spell check
>everything you send out.
>
>"what did Clinton do that came anywhere close to the USA Patriot Act?"
>
>Echelon anyone?
><http://www.fas.org/irp/program/process/echelon.htm,>http://www.fas.org/irp/program/process/echelon.htm,
>no knock searches on federal low-income housing? Mandatory sentencing for
>drug offenders?
Manditory sentancing was initiated by Ronnie Raygun and the elder Bush, and
really pushed for by the Republican controlled Senate.
>"i don't recall getting our country embroiled into a foreign conflict that
>is starting to stretch on with the looks of stretching on indefinately."
>
>Kosovo? Bosnia? They don't look to be ending either.
Remember that both Kosovo and Bosnia were done under both UN and NATO
aegis. Iraq was not. We could not even get some of our closest allies to
participate. Moreover there has been a significant US troop reduction in
both Kosovo and Bosnia in the last year - well before Iraq was even a gleam
in the administration chickenhawks' eyes.
>"We might not have had to fight china because of our Last presidents
>charisma and his ability to get deals done and work things out"
>
>If you call sending them every single U.S. patent on CDs and selling them
>a naval base on U.S. property, through which they were caught smuggling in
>hundreds of Ak-47s getting things done. I am still not comfortable with
>the counter Intel investigations that took part during his presidency.
>
>"The current president has been anti-un for the most part"
>
>And this is bad why?
>
>"becoming more belligerant and becoming if you aren't with us you're
>aganist us"
>
>That's how I feel. Remember nations don't have friends, they have
>interests, and if your not doing what we want, you're working against our
>interests.
>
>"You are talking about going back onto active duty do you really want to
>be embroiled in Iraq for the foreseeable future with a much more real
>threat of dieing on any given day as opposed to standard non-war footing"
>
>Don't talk about this. You don't know what you're talking about. The
>82nd is currently losing fewer troops than it does during regular training
>rotations from jumps and training accidents. We loose people in Eastern
>Europe, and in Asia, you just don't hear about it. You don't hear about
>the people we lose in support of our foolish drug war. You don't hear
>about the people we lose in Indonesia fighting Islamists there. The
>reason you're hearing about the deaths in Iraq is a political one.
>
>I don't want to go and fight anyone's war. I want to defend the young
>troops we have in the ranks. I want to take what I have learned and used
>to try and protect some of my closest friends. Finally, our country is at
>war. I don't have to agree with the reasons for that war. The
>authorized, constitutional head of our armed forces put them in harms
>way. That's enough for me. I am sorry Bill that you don't feel that
>responsibility.
>
>Might take away from you're video game and porn time I guess.
>
>I don't know why I even bother arguing with you. You are spoon fed by the
>media. Your views sway in the wind with what you perceive is the most
>commonly held opinion.
>
>Loathe
>
> >Hrm but what did clinton do that came anywhere close to the USA Patriot
> >Act?
> >And the china stuff i don't recall getting our country embroiled into a
> >foreign conflict that is starting to stretch on with the looks of
> >stretching on indefinately.
> >We might not have had to fight china because of our Last presidents
> >charisma and his ability to get deals done and work things out. Unlike
> >our current president who within weeks of taking office ripped apart all
> >the good work done by previous presidents in helping to make alliances
> >and bond the united states with europe and other parts of the world. The
> >current president has been anti-un for the most part, anti rest of the
> >world. After 9/11 he became even more so becoming more belligerant and
> >becoming if you aren't with us you're aganist us. You are talking about
> >going back onto active duty do you really want to be embroiled in Iraq
> >for the forseeable future with a much more real threat of dieing on any
> >given day as opposed to standard non-war footing? Dieing for your
> >country is all fine and dandy but remember pattons wonderful quote. "The
> >object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other
> >bastard die for his."
> >
> >--
> >Bill Wheatley
> >Senior Database Developer
> >eDiets.com, Inc.
> >(OTCBB: EDET)
> >3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> >Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> >V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> >F: (954) 360-9095
> >E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
> >
> >
>
>----------
>[
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
