Boomer, too.
And since when where the names Apollo and Starbuck nicknames?!?!?
and "William" Adama?
why!? why!?! WHY!??!\
o_0
will
Bailey, Neal wrote:
> ...and did you guys know that Starbuck is a Girl in the new series. (Of
> course there is nothing wrong with that, but it will take some getting
> used
> to if you are a hard core Starbuck fan.)
>
>
> Also the Battle Drones (Chromy Dudes with lights on head) are only
> supposed
> to make a few appearances until the can tell the story of how they become
> more human looking. Like the Hot chic in red on the previews is
> apparently a
> nasty Battle Drone responsible for killing millions but for some
> reason she
> does not know she is a drone. Well anyway it goes something like that.
>
>
> Some folks are getting very upset about the whole Girl thing... I
> think it's
> going to be a good series whether Starbuck is a he or she or He-She...
> I was
> surprise to hear that they were going to have Sturbuck to begin with.
>
>
> http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2003/12/07/starbuck_is_a____she/
> <http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2003/12/07/starbuck_is_a____she/>
>
>
> - Neal
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:15 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>
>
> is it a miniseries or is it a new tv series? i hear mini-series so i'm
> wondering why they don't just make it a tv show if its only a
> mini-series.
>
> or is it a mini-series which if it does well becomes a full series next
> year?
>
> --
> Bill Wheatley
> Senior Database Developer
> eDiets.com, Inc.
> (OTCBB: EDET)
> 3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> F: (954) 360-9095
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:12 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Battlestar Galactica
>
> I hope it's not as bad as the reviews say. I'm going to give it a chance
> for
> sure. I heard it is a bit oversexed, which I _really_ hope is wrong.
> Nothing
> is more silly than when folks try to over sex things. Does anyone
> remember
> the Uncle Ben ad campaign that used sex? Sex.... and rice. Um, yea, I
> get
> it.
> _____
> _____
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
