all, I was under the impression that apache found 2.x stable enough for production but that just not a lot of people had switched. we're about to roll out a big apache 2.x project here and it seems to be quite stable.
Sincerely, Leon Oosterwijk Dave Ramsey Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: DuSTiN KRySaK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:56 PM > To: CF-Linux > Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released, HELP > > > On 3/25/03 9:11 AM, "Stephen Moretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > spit this out > onto my computer screen: > > > It should also be noted that as far as all the notes on the > apache web site > > are concerned Apache 2.x is not a production ready application. > > > > (or at least thats the way it was the last time I looked) > > > > Regards > > > > Stephen > > Seems funny that if that is the case - why are distro's shipping with 2.x? > Not arguing (as I really don't know) - I just find it funny that companies > would ship with it - if that is the case. > > d > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=14 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=14 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.14
