> > Is there some difference > > between execution > > on Linux and Solaris? > > Let's see... > SUMMARY > ------------SIZE---RES---- > CFMX start: 136M 70M > CFMX after: 139M 77M
OK, this is very odd. The behavior I've observed on Solaris has been that the memory consumption during CFEXECUTE has been much higher than that. After looking into fork behavior, I concluded that CFMX was using fork. Your numbers don't demonstrate that. So, do you think there's some difference between JVMs or something else that would explain this? Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ phone: 202-797-5496 fax: 202-797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:14:3785 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/14 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:14 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.14 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
