> OK, this is very odd. The behavior I've observed on Solaris > has been that > the memory consumption during CFEXECUTE has been much higher > than that. > After looking into fork behavior, I concluded that CFMX was > using fork. Your > numbers don't demonstrate that. So, do you think there's some > difference > between JVMs or something else that would explain this?
I don't what would cause a difference. If you'd like to provide a functional reproducible case and a description of the environment/configuration, then I'd be happy to carry out further experiments in order to make comparisons. While we're all on the topic of performing careful tests in a controlled environment, I'd like to pass along this link: The Science of Catching Hidden Bugs http://www.stickyminds.com/sitewide.asp?ObjectId=2657&ObjectType=COL&Functio n=edetail&tt=nl -Steve ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:14:3786 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/14 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:14 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.14 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
