On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:14:45 -0500, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, this is very odd. The behavior I've observed on Solaris has been that > the memory consumption during CFEXECUTE has been much higher than that. > After looking into fork behavior, I concluded that CFMX was using fork. Your > numbers don't demonstrate that. So, do you think there's some difference > between JVMs or something else that would explain this? >
I have to say that I agree with Dave in that this was behavior I observer -- not just a hunch based on posts. We are using j2SE 1.4.2_05. However, we are two months past this problem (we have since taken the external program and wrapped it in a Zope external method that we now call via cfhttp), so I don't know if I will be able to get a repro case. I will definitely try though. Steve, any chance you could try this on a CFMX for J2EE instance that has CFMX all patched *up to* Updater 1 -- don't put Updater 1 on it. This *may* have been the configuration we were using. Regards, Dave. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:14:3790 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/14 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:14 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.14 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
