This message came from the CF Trac system. Do not reply. Instead, enter your
comments in the CF Trac system at http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/.
#107: CF Data Model 1.7
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: markh | Owner: cf-conventions@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone:
Component: cf-conventions | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
\
\
\
\
\
\
Comment (by jonblower):
Hi all,
Just to add a vote to this debate having talked off-line a while ago with
Jonathan and David, and having read Mark and Jim's comments above. I'm
persuaded that formula_terms and grid_mapping are doing different jobs.
Formula_terms turns dimensionless coordinate values into dimensional ones;
grid_mapping adds information about CRSs that is not already implicitly or
explicitly present. You might need both, for example to turn dimensionless
vertical coordinates into heights (using formula_terms) and then provide
the ellipsoid (using grid_mapping).
Therefore I don't see much benefit in conflating these orthogonal
concepts.
Cheers,
Jon
\
\
\
--
Ticket URL: <http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107#comment:83>
CF Metadata <http://cf-convention.github.io/>
CF Metadata
This message came from the CF Trac system. To unsubscribe, without
unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to
"[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your
message.
