This message came from the CF Trac system.  Do not reply.  Instead, enter your 
comments in the CF Trac system at http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/.

#107: CF Data Model 1.7
-----------------------------+------------------------------
  Reporter:  markh           |      Owner:  cf-conventions@…
      Type:  task            |     Status:  new
  Priority:  medium          |  Milestone:
 Component:  cf-conventions  |    Version:
Resolution:                  |   Keywords:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
\
\
\
\
\
\

Comment (by jonathan):

 Dear Jim

 Both `grid_mapping` and `formula_terms` can be described logically by the
 [http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107?replyto=55#comment:55 text which
 David posted]. For instance,

   * a vertical georeference construct might apply to an atmosphere hybrid
 height coordinate, in which case it would contain the `a` (dimensions of
 height) and `b` (dimensionless) auxiliary coordinate constructs, a field
 of surface height above the geoid, the auxiliary coordinate construct of
 height above the geoid (if it exists in the dataset), and optionally the
 name of the geoid (if we permit this extension). Its purpose is to relate
 the `a` and `b`, which by themselves do not geolocate the data, to the
 height above the geoid, which is a geophysically defined surface whose
 precise realisation might be specified as well.

   * a horizontal georeference construct might apply to a rotated latitude-
 longitude coordinate system, in which case it would contain the rotated
 latitude and longitude coordinate constructs, the (unrotated,
 geographical) latitude and longitude of the rotated pole, the auxiliary
 coordinate constructs of latitude and longitude, and optionally the
 definition of the reference ellipsoid. Its purpose is to relate the
 rotated latitude and longitude, which by themselves do not geolocate the
 data, to geographical latitude and longitude, which do geolocate the data,
 optionally with the ellipsoid to make their definition more precise.

 What is to be gained in clarity or simplicity by regarding these two
 things as distinct concepts? We don't talk about transforms or coordinate
 reference systems because these terms have technical and sometimes
 restrictive meanings, and therefore may make the description less clear.

 Best wishes

 Jonathan
\
\
\

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://kitt.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/107#comment:79>
CF Metadata <http://cf-convention.github.io/>
CF Metadata
This message came from the CF Trac system.  To unsubscribe, without 
unsubscribing to the regular cf-metadata list, send a message to 
"[email protected]" with "unsubscribe cf-metadata" in the body of your 
message.

Reply via email to